(Originally asked at https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2399091/restricted-representations-and-irreducibility-in-sl-2q)

I'm working through the Fulton-Harris ad-hoc method of constructing the character table of $SL_2(q)$ (for $q$ an odd prime power), $\S$5.2 for reference.

I am at a point where we are considering representations of $GL_2(q)$, and how they decompose on restriction to a subgroup of index 2 (specifically the subgroup of elements with square determinant, which we will call $H$). We then consider the further restriction from this subgroup to $SL_2(q)$.

I understand almost everything. There are two irreducible representations of $GL_2(q)$, say $W,X$, that each split into a direct sum of irreducible representations of $H$: $\ \ W|_{H}=W'\oplus W''$, $X|_H = X'\oplus X''$. We know the dimensions of these representations - each is half the dimension of the larger rep.

Now, we have classified all irreducible representations of $SL_2(q)$ except 4, whose dimensions are known to be the same as $W',W'',X',X''$. The book then claims (bottom of page 72):

"This shows that these representations ($W',W'',X',X''$) stay irreducible on restriction from $H$ to $SL_2(q)$."

I'm confused as to why they make this assumption - or am I overlooking something obvious? Thanks in advance.


They don't assume anything. They just carry out the argument you describe. They explain that the restriction of the rep to $H$ splits as a direct sum of two irreducibles and then in the next sentence they explain that since the restriction of the rep to $SL_2(q)$ is also known to consists of two irreducibles by character theory, the irreducible pieces appearing in the restriction to $H$ must remain irreducible, when we restrict to $SL_2(q)$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.