1
$\begingroup$

Let $k$ be a field of characteristic zero and $X$ be a non-singular rationally connected variety over $k$. Let $L$ be a finite field extension of $k$. This induces a proper morphism $p:X_L \to X_k$. Is it true that for any torsion-free semi-stable sheaf $E$ on $X_L$, the coherent sheaf $p_*E$ is semi-stable on $X_k$?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What definition of semistability are you using? If $p_*E$ is destabilized by $F$, i.e., some appropriate slope of $F$ is greater than the slope of $p_*F$, then presumably the same holds for $p^*F$ and $p^*p_*E$. Since $p^*p_*E$ is $E\otimes_L(L\otimes_k L) \cong E^{\oplus n}$ for $n=[L:k]$, this would seem to contradict semistability of $E$. $\endgroup$ – Jason Starr Aug 18 '17 at 17:31
  • $\begingroup$ @JasonStarr: your comment and my answer are virtually identical. However, $L \otimes_k L \cong L^{[L:k]}$ only holds if $k \subseteq L$ is Galois. Otherwise, you first have to pass to the Galois closure of $L/k$ (or, as I do, all the way to $\bar k$). $\endgroup$ – R. van Dobben de Bruyn Aug 18 '17 at 17:42
  • $\begingroup$ @R.vanDobbendeBruyn. I absolutely agree that as a (left or right) $L$-algebra, the tensor product $L\otimes_k L$ is not always isomorphic to the product algebra $L\times \dots \times L$. However, as a (left or right) $L$-module, the tensor product is a vector space of dimension $n$. I believe that is what is relevant here. Are you saying that the $L$-module structure gets shifted through $L\otimes_k L$, so that the algebra structure is relevant? $\endgroup$ – Jason Starr Aug 18 '17 at 17:59
  • $\begingroup$ @JasonStarr: Sorry, I misread your argument and gave the wrong objection. I think $p^* p_* E$ is not $E \otimes_L (L \otimes_k L)$, but rather $E_k \otimes_k L$ (where $E_k$ forgets the $L$-structure). I see no way of relating the two (over $L$), and in fact I don't think that they are the same. For example, if $X$ is an elliptic curve over $\mathbb R$ and $E = \mathcal O(P)$ for a non-real point $P$, then $p^* p_* E$ should be $\mathcal O(P) \oplus \mathcal O(\bar P)$, which is not isomorphic to $E^2$. $\endgroup$ – R. van Dobben de Bruyn Aug 19 '17 at 15:33
  • $\begingroup$ @R.vanDobbendeBruyn. For a Cartesian square of schemes, say $f:X\to Z$, $g:Y\to Z$ and $f':W\to Y$ and $g':W\to X$, if $f$ is quasi-compact and quasi-separated, and if $g$ is flat, then for every quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_X$-module $E$, the natural map $g^*f_*E \to (f')_*(g')^*E$ is an isomorphism. For $f$ and $g$ both equal to $\text{Spec}(L)\to \text{Spec}(k)$, it follows that $g^*f_*E$ is the same as the pushforward of the pullback of $E$. Thus, for every scheme $T$ over $\text{Spec}(L)$, for every quasi-coherent sheaf $E$ on $T$, $g^*f_*E$ equals $(L\otimes_k L)\otimes_L E$. $\endgroup$ – Jason Starr Aug 19 '17 at 17:25
4
$\begingroup$

Assuming what you mean is that $X$ is projective and $\mathcal E$ is Gieseker-semistable, the answer is yes.

Lemma. Let $X$ be a projective $k$-scheme, and let $\mathcal E$ be a semistable sheaf on $X$. Then $\mathcal E_{\bar k}$ is semistable on $X_{\bar k}$.

Proof. Let $\mathcal F \subseteq \mathcal E_{\bar k}$ be a proper nonzero subsheaf, and assume that $\mu(\mathcal F) > \mu(\mathcal E)$. Then $\mathcal F$ is defined over some finite extension $k \subseteq \ell$. Let $p \colon X_\ell \to X$ be the projection. Then $p_* \mathcal F \subseteq p_* \mathcal E_\ell$ is a subsheaf, with $\mu(p_*\mathcal F) > \mu(p_* \mathcal E_\ell)$. But $p_* \mathcal E_\ell = p_* p^* \mathcal E = \mathcal E^{[\ell:k]}$ is semistable, so such subsheaves cannot exist. $\square$

Remark. The same statement with semistable replaced by stable is false. See for example this post.

Remark. Conversely, it follows from uniqueness of the Harder–Narasimhan filtration that if $\mathcal E_{\bar k}$ is semistable, then so is $\mathcal E$. Indeed, uniqueness of the HN filtration implies (using the lemma above) that it commutes with base change of the field.

Corollary. Let $X$ be a projective $k$-scheme, let $k\subseteq \ell$ be a finite separable extension, and let $\mathcal E$ be a semistable sheaf on $X_\ell$. Then $p_* \mathcal E$ is semistable.

Proof. By the remark, it suffices to show that $(p_* \mathcal E)_{\bar k}$ is semistable. Because $\ell \otimes_k \bar k \cong \bar k^{[\ell:k]}$, the base change of $p \colon X_\ell \to X$ to $\bar k$ looks like $$p_{\bar k} \colon \coprod_{\sigma \colon \ell \to \bar k} X_{\bar k} \to X_{\bar k}.$$ By the lemma above, the base change $\mathcal E_{\bar \ell}$ is semistable. Under $p_{\bar k}$, we are merely taking the sum of the Galois conjugates of $\mathcal E_{\bar \ell}$. It is straightforward to check that each of these Galois conjugates is semistable of the same slope, hence their sum is semistable. $\square$

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Doesn't this imply that a non-empty moduli space $M_X(P)$ parametrizing semi-stable sheaves on $X$ with Hilbert polynomial $P$, will always have a $k$-rational point? In particular, if I understand correctly, the moduli space being non-empty implies that there exists a finite extension $L$ of $k$ such that there exists a semi-stable sheaf $E$ on $X_L$ with Hilbert polynomial $P$. Then, by your argument, we have that $p_∗E$ is semi-stable on $X$, which will give a $k$-rational point of $M_X(P)$. Am I missing something? $\endgroup$ – user43198 Aug 21 '17 at 5:22
  • $\begingroup$ @user43198: the pushforward will not have the same Hilbert polynomial. Its rank is multiplied by $[\ell:k]$ under pushforward. $\endgroup$ – R. van Dobben de Bruyn Aug 21 '17 at 10:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.