I have seen the Fourier and Mellin transform for Riemann

$\Xi (t)=\xi ({\frac 12}+it)$


$\xi (s)={\tfrac {1}{2}}s(s-1)\pi ^{{-s/2}}\Gamma \left({\tfrac {1}{2}}s\right)\zeta (s)$

Fourier transform of $\Xi(t)$ is:

$\Xi (t) = \int_{-\infty}^\infty\Phi(u)e^{iut}\,du$


$\Phi(u) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty (4\pi^2n^4e^{9u/2} - 6n^2\pi e^{5u/2} ) exp(-n^2\pi e^{2u})$

But I had not seen something similar for Fourier or Mellin transform for Riemann $\zeta(s)$ itself.

Is there a "closed form" formula for Fourier or Mellin transform for Riemann $\zeta(s)$ itself ?

Thank you.


$\zeta(s)=\sum_{n=1}^\infty n^{-s}$ is the Laplace transform of the distribution $S(u) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \delta(u-\log n)$.

  • $\zeta(s) = \mathcal{L}[S(u)](s) = \int_{-\infty}^\infty S(u) e^{-su}du$ converges for $\Re(s) > 1$.

  • For $\Re(s) \in (0,1)$ it becomes the bilateral Laplace transform $\zeta(s) = \mathcal{L}[S(u)-e^u](s) =\int_{-\infty}^\infty (S(u)-e^u) e^{-su}du$

  • For $\Re(s) \in (-1,0)$ it is $\zeta(s) = \mathcal{L}[S(u)-e^u+\frac{1}{2}](s) =\int_{-\infty}^\infty (S(u)-e^u+\frac{1}{2}) e^{-su}du$

  • For $\Re(s) \in (-K,-K+1)$ it is $\zeta(s) = \mathcal{L}[S(u)-\sum_{k=0}^K \frac{B_k}{k!}e^{(1-k)u}](s) =\int_{-\infty}^\infty (S(u)-\sum_{k=0}^K \frac{B_k}{k!}e^{(1-k)u}) e^{-su}du$ where $B_k$ are the Bernouilli numbers.

Thus for $\sigma \in (-K,-K+1)$, the inverse Fourier transform (in the sense of distributions) of $\hat{f}(\xi)=\zeta(\sigma+2i \pi \xi)$ is $f(u)= e^{-\sigma u}(S(u)-\sum_{k=0}^K \frac{B_k}{k!}e^{(1-k)u})$.

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ It is a consequence of the EMSF $\endgroup$ – reuns Jul 26 '17 at 4:25
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you ! Is there something similar for "closed form" Mellin transform of Riemann $\zeta(s)$ ? $\endgroup$ – david Jul 26 '17 at 15:25
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ @david Come on.. $\int_0^\infty f(x) x^{-s-1}dx=\int_{-\infty}^\infty f(e^u) e^{-su}du$ $\endgroup$ – reuns Jul 27 '17 at 3:53
  • $\begingroup$ Very instructive comment. Could you elaborate a little bit more on the meaning of the regularization terms for $0<|\Re(s)|<1$ and how to get them? $\endgroup$ – Alexandre Jun 27 '18 at 7:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Alexandre My answer really follows the same process as in $\frac{\zeta(s)}{s} = \int_1^\infty \lfloor x \rfloor x^{-s-1}dx$ for $\Re(s) > 1$ and $\frac{\zeta(s)}{s} = \frac{1}{s-1}+\int_1^\infty (\lfloor x \rfloor-x) x^{-s-1}dx=\int_0^\infty (\lfloor x \rfloor-x) x^{-s-1}dx$ for $\Re(s) \in (0,1)$ and $S(u)$ is the derivative of $\lfloor e^u \rfloor$ $\endgroup$ – reuns Sep 8 '18 at 21:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.