I suppose this question could be phrased in terms of Galois representations, but I'm asking it this way.

Let $n>1$ be an integer. If $K$ is a number field with $\operatorname{Gal}(K/\mathbb{Q}) \cong GL_2(\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z})$ (edit) and containing the $n$-th roots of unity (/edit), must there exist an elliptic curve $E$ defined over $\mathbb{Q}$ such that $K \subseteq \mathbb{Q}(E[n])$? It's not necessary to produce the curve, although it would be cool.

If not, is there a good way to test if this holds for a given $K$?

(If you want to restrict to the case where $n$ is a prime power, that's fine.)

  • 10
    $\begingroup$ No, because such an extension need not contain the $n$-th roots of unity (whereas $\mu_n \subset \mathbb{Q}(E[n])$ by the Weil pairing, and you may evidently not have a proper containment $K \subsetneq \mathbb{Q}(E[n])$). $\endgroup$ – Vesselin Dimitrov Jul 12 '17 at 18:36
  • $\begingroup$ Of course I should have thought about that, thank you. Is it possible the question is interesting if we insist that $\mu_n \in K$? I will edit my question. $\endgroup$ – Bobby Grizzard Jul 13 '17 at 0:29

I have two things to add to this discussion.

$\bullet$ For $n = 2$ and $n = 3$, every Galois extension of $\mathbb{Q}$ with Galois group ${\rm GL}_{2}(\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z})$ does arise from an elliptic curve (by a result of Shepard-Barron and Taylor from 1997 - see the reference in the paper of Dieulefait linked to below.) For $n = 4$, this is not true (see this paper).

$\bullet$ For $p \geq 7$ prime, it is known that not every Galois representation $\rho : G_{\mathbb{Q}} \to GL_{2}(\mathbb{F}_{p})$ arises from an elliptic curve, even if we restrict $\rho$ to have cyclotomic determinant. This is shown in a paper of Dieulefait for $p \geq 7$, because one can construct Galois representations using modular forms of different weights. This somehow doesn't seem quite the same as starting with a field $K/\mathbb{Q}$ with $Gal(K/\mathbb{Q}) \cong GL_{2}(\mathbb{F}_{p})$. (Any two isomorphisms between $Gal(K/\mathbb{Q})$ and $GL_{2}(\mathbb{F}_{p})$ differ by an automorphism of $GL_{2}(\mathbb{F}_{p})$ and I haven't been able to find a convenient reference for what ${\rm Aut}(GL_{2}(\mathbb{F}_{p}))$ is.)

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The ATLAS will at least tell you Aut(PSL_2(F_p)). $\endgroup$ – Noam D. Elkies Jul 13 '17 at 2:58
  • $\begingroup$ Shepard-Barron and Taylor also cover the case $n=5$, right? $\endgroup$ – David E Speyer Jul 13 '17 at 13:52

This is likely a very hard problem once $n \geq 7$.

Such $E$ are parametrized by a twist of the modular curve ${\rm X}(n)$; this curve is rational for $n \leq 5$ (so for those $n$ one can use the Hasse principle), but of genus at least $3$ for $n\geq 7$. Thus if $n \geq 7$ there are at most finitely many $E$ (Mordell-Faltings) but we do not have a general technique for deciding whether one exists. This was the main difficulty that Poonen, Schaefer, and Stoll had to overcome for several special choices of $K$ in their paper

Bjorn Poonen, Edward F. Schaefer, and Michael Stoll: Twists of $X(7)$ and primitive solutions to $x^2+y^3=z^7$, Duke Math. J. 137 #1 (2007), 103-158 (arXiv:math/0508174).

(For $n=6$ the modular curve ${\rm X}(6)$ is isomorphic with the CM elliptic curve $Y^2 = X^3 + 1$, and the problem reduces to deciding the existence of rational points on a principal homogeneous space for a twist $Y^2 = X^3 + d$ of this curve; such questions are often tractable in practice, though even here no general algorithm is known.)

  • $\begingroup$ Actually Poonen, Schaefer, and Stoll had to solve the harder problem of finding all rational points (possibly satisfying some auxiliary local conditions) on each of the relevant twists of ${\rm X}(7)$. $\endgroup$ – Noam D. Elkies Jul 13 '17 at 1:49
  • $\begingroup$ It is actually several twists (in bijection with the square classes in $(\mathbb Z/n\mathbb Z)^\times$), depending on the symplectic structure coming from the Weil pairing. If $n$ is an odd prime, there are two twists, and the question is whether at least one of them has a rational point. $\endgroup$ – Michael Stoll Jul 13 '17 at 17:55

This is mostly adding to Vesselin Dimitrov's comment.

If there exists a regular extension of $\mathbb{Q}(t)$ with Galois group $G := GL_2(\mathbb{Z}/n)$ (ie, $\mathbb{Q}$ is algebraically closed inside the extension), then we can construct a $GL_2(\mathbb{Z}/n)$-Galois extension of $\mathbb{Q}$ which does not contain $\mu_n$, and hence cannot contain $K$ (since any such $K$ must be equal to $\mathbb{Q}(E[n])$).

(I believe it's expected, and certainly proved in some cases, that $GL_2(\mathbb{Z}/n)$ occurs as a regular Galois group over $\mathbb{Q}(t)$, though I'm having trouble finding references.)

Specifically, take a regular $G$-Galois extension of $\mathbb{Q}(t)$, which corresponds to a $G$-Galois cover $Y\rightarrow X$, where $X$ is some open subscheme of $\mathbb{P}^1_{\mathbb{Q}}$.

Let $K$ be any number field (for our purposes lets take $K = \mathbb{Q}(\mu_n)$), then by Hilbert irreducibility, $Y_K\rightarrow X_K$ has infinitely many connected fibers. More specifically, the $K$-points of $X_K$ over which the fiber is disconnected is a thin subset of $X_K(K)$ (One key property of thin sets is that subsets of thin sets are also thin). Let "$A$" denote this subset.

Since $Y_K\rightarrow X_K$ is $G$-Galois, these connected fibers are just $G$-Galois field extensions of $\mathbb{Q}$.

Now consider the set "$B$" of $\mathbb{Q}$-points of $X$, viewed as a subset of $X_K(K)$. I.e., given any map $\text{Spec }\mathbb{Q}\rightarrow X$, we can pull back this map by the natural base change map $X_K\rightarrow X$ to get a map $\text{Spec }K\rightarrow X_K$.

This set $B\subset X_K(K)$ is not thin (e.g. Proposition 3.2.1 in Serre's Topics in Galois Theory). Thus, we have two subsets $A,B\subset X_K(K)$, where $A$ is thin, and $B$ is not thin, and so $B$ is not contained in $A$ - In order words, there exist a $K$-point $x_K\in X_K(K)$, which have connected fiber in $Y_K$, which actually come from a $\mathbb{Q}$-point $x\in X(\mathbb{Q})$, but this means that the fiber of $Y\rightarrow X$ above this $\mathbb{Q}$-point $x$ is connected, and so is equal to $\text{Spec }L$ for some $G$-Galois extension $L/\mathbb{Q}$, and furthermore, since the connected fiber of $Y_K\rightarrow X_K$ above $x_K$ is $$\text{Spec }L\times_{\text{Spec }\mathbb{Q}}\text{Spec }K = \text{Spec }L\otimes_{\mathbb{Q}} K$$ this implies that $L\otimes_\mathbb{Q}K$ is a field - in particular $L\cap K = \mathbb{Q}$.

What this says is that if the "regular inverse galois problem" is true for $G$, then for any number field $K$, one can find $G$-Galois extensions of $\mathbb{Q}$ which intersect $K$ trivially.

  • $\begingroup$ An (any old) Galois $\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{Z}/n)$ extension of $\mathbb{Q}(t)$ will do for our purposes here, for there are easily normal (abelian) $(\mathbb{Z}/n)^{\times}$ extensions of $\mathbb{Q}$ not containing any non-trivial roots of unity. Start with any such abelian field, and construct an $\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{Z}/n)$ Galois extension of it. $\endgroup$ – Vesselin Dimitrov Jul 12 '17 at 22:45
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @VesselinDimitrov One must be somewhat careful to guarantee that the $SL(2,\mathbb{Z}/n)$ extension of the $(\mathbb{Z}/n)^\times$ extension is both Galois over $\mathbb{Q}$, and has Galois group $GL(2,\mathbb{Z}/n)$, and not some other extension of $(\mathbb{Z}/n)^\times$ by $SL(2,\mathbb{Z}/n)$. I haven't thought about this much myself - is there a standard method of constructing a $G$-Galois extension by stitching together extensions with Galois group equal to the simple composition factors of $G$? $\endgroup$ – Will Chen Jul 13 '17 at 1:00
  • $\begingroup$ You are right, this is not as easy as I expected. $\endgroup$ – Vesselin Dimitrov Jul 13 '17 at 3:16

Several remarks:

It should be easy to make counterexamples when $n$ is not a prime power, even with cyclotomic determinant. Let $E_1$ and $E_2$ be non-CM non-isogenous curves. Let $E_r$ have $p-a^r_p+1$ points modulo $p$. Choose a prime $p$ where $a^1_p \neq a^2_p$. Then, if we take $\ell_1$ and $\ell_2$ large enough and distinct, by Serre's open image theorem, we should have $Gal(\mathbb{Q}(E_r[\ell_r])/\mathbb{Q}) \cong GL_2(\mathbb{Z}/\ell_r)$ and (I think) $\mathbb{Q}(E_1[\ell_1])$ and $\mathbb{Q}(E_2[\ell_2])$ dijoint, so $Gal(\mathbb{Q}(E_1[\ell_1], E_2[\ell_2])/\mathbb{Q}) \cong GL_2(\mathbb{Z}/\ell_1) \times GL_2(\mathbb{Z}/\ell_2) \cong GL_2(\mathbb{Z}/(\ell_1 \ell_2))$.

Suppose there were an elliptic curve $E$ with $E[\ell_1 \ell_2] \cong E_1[\ell_1] \times E_2[\ell_2]$ as Galois modules. Let $E$ have $p-a_p+1$ points modulo $p$. Then $a_p \cong a_p^r \bmod \ell_r$. But, if we choose $\ell_1$ and $\ell_2$ large enough, none of the solutions to $a_p \cong a_p^r \bmod \ell_r$ will lie in $[-2\sqrt{p}, 2\sqrt{p}]$.

If $\ell$ is an odd prime, $K \supset \mathbb{Q}(\mu_{\ell})$ and $Gal(K/\mathbb{Q}) \cong GL_2(\mathbb{F}_{\ell})$, then I claim that we can choose the isomorphism to have cyclotomic determinant. In other words, we can arrange that the diagram $$\begin{matrix} Gal(K/\mathbb{Q}) &\cong& GL_2(\mathbb{F}_{\ell}) \\ \downarrow && \downarrow \det \\ Gal(\mathbb{Q}(\mu_{\ell}) & \cong & \mathbb{F}_{\ell}^{\times} \\ \end{matrix}$$ commutes, where the left down arrow is the standard Galois theory map and the bottom isomorphism is the standard one.

Proof: Note that $$\begin{pmatrix} 1&0 \\0&-1 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} 1&-1 \\0&1 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} 1&0 \\0&-1 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} 1&1 \\0&1 \end{pmatrix}= \begin{pmatrix} 1&2 \\0&1 \end{pmatrix}$$ is a commutator. Since $\ell$ is odd, this means that its $(\ell+1)/2$-th power, namely $\left( \begin{smallmatrix} 1&1 \\ 0 &1 \end{smallmatrix} \right)$ is in the commutator subgroup, as is $\left( \begin{smallmatrix} 1&0 \\ 1 &1 \end{smallmatrix} \right)$. These generate $SL_2(\mathbb{F}_{\ell})$, so the commutator subgroup is $SL_2(\mathbb{F}_{\ell})$. Thus, any character $GL_2(\mathbb{F}_{\ell}) \to \mathbb{F}_{\ell}^{\times}$ must be some power of the cyclotomic character $\chi$.

Chase around the diagram left-down-right to map $GL_2(\mathbb{F}_{\ell}) \to \mathbb{F}_{\ell}^{\times}$; let the result be $\chi^k$. Since this map is surjective, $k$ is a unit modulo $\ell-1$; let $j$ be its inverse. Note that $2|\ell-1$ so $j$ is odd, say $j=2r+1$. Modify the top isomorphism by the automorphism $g \mapsto (\det g)^r g$ of $GL_2(\mathbb{F}_{\ell})$, and now the diagram commutes.

I suspect there are fields $K$ with $K \supset \mathbb{Q}(i)$ and $Gal(K/\mathbb{Q}) \cong GL_2(\mathbb{Z}/4)$ where the map $$GL_2(\mathbb{Z}/4) \cong Gal(K/\mathbb{Q}) \twoheadrightarrow Gal(\mathbb{Q}(i)/\mathbb{Q}) \cong (\mathbb{Z}/4)^{\times}$$ is not cyclotomic, and can't be made so by any automorphism of $GL_2(\mathbb{Z}/4)$. Namely, there is a map $GL_2(\mathbb{Z}/4) \to \{ \pm 1 \}$ defined as the composition $$GL_2(\mathbb{Z}/4) \to GL_2(\mathbb{F}_2) \cong S_3 \to \{ \pm 1 \}$$ where the last map is the sign character. This map sends $\left( \begin{smallmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ -1 & 0 \end{smallmatrix} \right)$ to $-1$, while determinant sends it to $1$. The conjugacy class of $\left( \begin{smallmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ -1 & 0 \end{smallmatrix} \right)$ can be intrinsically described as the only conjugacy class which squares to the non-identity central element in $GL_2(\mathbb{Z}/4)$. So no automorphism of $GL_2(\mathbb{Z}/4)$ can equate these characters.

I see no reason that this map $GL_2(\mathbb{Z}/4) \to \{ \pm 1 \}$ couldn't correspond to an inclusion $\mathbb{Q}(i) \subset K$.

  • $\begingroup$ It's a neat and surprisingly little-known fact that ${\rm GL}_2({\bf Z}/4)$ is isomorphic with $\{\pm1\} \times S_4$. $\endgroup$ – Noam D. Elkies Jul 13 '17 at 17:27
  • $\begingroup$ @NoamD.Elkies I did not know that! But, wait, I am confused. Both groups have a unique non-identity central element -- namely $- \mathrm{Id}$ in $GL_2(\mathbb{Z}/4)$ and $(-1, \mathrm{Id})$ in $\{ \pm 1 \} \times S_4$. But $-\mathrm{Id}$ has a square root, $\left( \begin{smallmatrix} 0&1 \\ -1&0 \end{smallmatrix} \right)$ and $(-1,\mathrm{Id})$ doesn't. So how can this be right? $\endgroup$ – David E Speyer Jul 13 '17 at 17:38
  • $\begingroup$ @NoamD.Elkies Also, the order is wrong. $|GL_2(\mathbb{Z}/4)|$ is $96$, not $48$. Perhaps you meant $PGL_2(\mathbb{Z}/4)$? $\endgroup$ – David E Speyer Jul 13 '17 at 17:40
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Sorry, it is indeed PGL_2. The GL_2 statement is not just little-known but wrong ;-) :-( $\endgroup$ – Noam D. Elkies Jul 13 '17 at 17:56
  • $\begingroup$ The somewhat remarkable thing is that ${\rm PGL}_2({\bf Z}/4)$ has a central element of determinant $-1$. (There has to be, once we know that ${\rm PGL}_2({\bf Z}/4) \cong S_4$, because $S_4$ has no outer automorphism.) $\endgroup$ – Noam D. Elkies Jul 14 '17 at 0:47

Two comments. First, there is a trick used by Serre, Ribet and others to prove, using an old result of Goursat, that under certain assumptions such as absolute irreducibility, two mod p Galois representations cut the same Galois extension if and only if they are twists of each other. I guess using this combined with the reference in a previous answer should be enough to answer your question.

Secondly, if you take n to be a prime power with exponent at least 2, it is not even clear that a mod n representation can be lifted at all to any p-adic representation, even if you admit coefficients in extensions of the p adic field. Further assumptions such as finite ramification set make the question even harder. My guess is that in general you should not expect existence of any geometric p adic lift, in particular this rules out elliptic curves.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.