Birational pullbacks of divisors on singular varieties Actually I have two related questions.
Here is the first...
Suppose $X$ is a, possibly singular, complex projective variety.
Let $D$ be an effective Cartier divisor on $X$ and $x\in X$ a closed point such that the multiplicity of $D$ at $x$, usually denoted by $mult_x(D)$, is $k>0$.
Let $\mu:X'\rightarrow X$ be the blowing up at $x$, and let $E$ be the exceptional divisor.
Is it true that the order of $\mu^*(D)$ along $E$ is $k$?
I'm sure about it in the smooth case and I suppose it is true also in the singular case but I don't have a reference.
The second question is the following:
Suppose $(X,\Delta)$ is a KLT pair,  and $f:Y\rightarrow X$ is a log resolution of the pair $(X,\Delta)$.
Let $E$ be an exceptional divisor on $Y$ mapping to a point on $X$ and let $a(E,X,\Delta)$ be its the discrepancy. 
In other words $a(E,X,\Delta)$ is the order along $E$ of the divisor $K_Y-\mu^*(K_X+\Delta)$.
I know $a(E,X,\Delta)\leq 1$ if $X$ is smooth.
It really seems to me this is also true in the singular case. Do I wrong?
In any case do tou have a proof or a reference for this?
Thanks a lot!
 A: For the first question, I think the answer is no.  Consider the following example:
$X = Spec k[x,y,z]/(xy - z^2)$ a quadric cone.  Consider the Cartier divisor $D = V(z)$.  It has two irreducible components corresponding to the ideals $(x,z)$ and $(y,z)$ respectively (these are non-Cartier, Q-Cartier divisors).  Both components smooth and they meet at the origin and so the multiplicity of $D$ (of this nodal singularity) is $2$.  By multiplicity, I assume you mean the multiplicity of the scheme $D$ at a point.
On the other hand, if you blow up the origin $(x,y,z)$ you get a chart $$k[x/z, y/z, z]/( (x/z)(y/z) - 1).$$  The pull back of $D$ on this chart is just $z = 0$ (one copy of the exceptional divisor) so the order of $\mu^*(D)$ along $E$ is equal to 1.  (The order of the components along the exceptional divisor is $1/2$ in each case, but they are $\mathbb{Q}$-Cartier)
There's a deeper problem in your first question though.  If I recall correctly, in general, when you blow-up a point $x \in X$ on a singular variety, there isn't a unique prime exceptional divisor lying over $x$.  There are probably multiple such divisors.  To make matters worse, the pull back of your given Cartier divisor can have different multiplicities along these different exceptional divisors.  
For the second question:
You assume that the pair $(X, \Delta)$ is klt, and you define the discrepancy at $E$ to be the order along $E$ of $K_Y - \mu^*(K_X + \Delta)$.  Then you say that you know that $a(E, X, \Delta) \leq 1$ if $X$ is smooth.  This isn't true.  
I assume you know that the definition of klt implies that these discrepancies are all $> -1$.  However, consider the following example.
$X = Spec k[x,y,z]$ and $\Delta = 0$.  This pair is certainly klt.  When you blow up the origin though, the relative canonical divisor $K_{Y/X} = 2E$, two copies of the exceptional (if you blow up the origin in $\mathbb{A}^n$, you get $n-1$ copies of the exceptional divisor).  If you blow up points on that exceptional divisor (and repeat), you get further exceptional divisors with greater and greater discrepancy.  
Hopefully I didn't misunderstand the question.
