The modular curve $Y(n)$ which over $\mathbb{C}$ is $\mathcal{H}/\Gamma(n)$ is often viewed as a curve defined over $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta_n)$. However, if one twists the moduli problem to be given by pairs $(E,\alpha)$ where $E$ is an elliptic curve over some $\mathbb{Q}$-scheme $S$, and $\alpha$ is an isomorphism: $$\alpha : E[n]\stackrel{\sim}{\longrightarrow}\mathbb{Z}/n\times\mu_n$$ "of determinant 1", then one obtains a model of $Y(n)$ over $\mathbb{Q}$.

The usual $q$-expansion arguments show that $Y(n)_{\mathbb{Q}(\zeta_n)}$ is isomorphic to the Spec of the ring of modular functions (modular forms of weight 0) for $\Gamma$ whose Fourier coefficients lie in $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta_n)$.

My question is: Is there an $n\ge 3$ such that $Y(n)_\mathbb{Q}$ isomorphic to the Spec of modular functions for $\Gamma$ whose Fourier coefficients lie in $\mathbb{Q}$? (ie, are there enough of these functions?)

My guess is that the answer is no, but how would one argue this?

  • $\begingroup$ Diamond&Shurman's book p.298 seems to be about this $\endgroup$ – reuns Jun 3 '17 at 22:13

I think this is in fact always true. Let $f$ be a rational function on this moduli space which is defined over $\mathbb Q$.

Recall that the Tate curve over is an elliptic curve $E / \mathbb Q((q))$ which is $q$-adically analytically and holomorphically isomorphic to the quotient $\mathbb G_m / \langle q \rangle$. So if we base change to $\mathbb Q ( q^{1/n})$, there is an isomorphism $E[n] \to \mathbb Z/n \times \mu_n$, which sends $q^{1/n}$ to $(1,0)$ and sends $\mu_n$ to $(0,\mu_n)$.

This defines a map $\operatorname{Spec} \mathbb Q((q)) \to Y(n)_{\mathbb Q}$ by the universal property of $Y(n)_{\mathbb Q}$. Pulling back $f$ along this map, we obtain a power series in $q^{1/n}$ with rational coefficients.

One can see that this is the same as the usual power series coefficients using the fact that the Tate curve $\mathbb G_m / \langle q \rangle$, is, for $q=e^{ 2 \pi i \tau}$, isomorphic to $\mathbb C / \langle 1,\tau\rangle$ under the map $z \to e^{ 2\pi i z}$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.