6
$\begingroup$

Let $G$ be a compact subgroup of $O(n)$. Let $\rho$ be a continuous finite dimensional representation of $G$.

Question Is it true that there exists a continuous finite dimensional representation $\pi$ of $O(n)$ such that $\rho$ is a direct summand of the restriction of $\pi$ to $G$?

I am almost sure that this is true. A reference would be very helpful.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ No, this is false. For $n\geq 3$, any nontrivial representation of $\mathrm{O}(n)$ has its kernel contained in $\{\pm I\} $. Just take for $G$ a finite group and for $\rho $ a representation with $\#\,\mathrm{Ker} \rho \geq 3$. $\endgroup$ – abx May 3 '17 at 9:51
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @abx: I am not sure that I understood your argument. I think that it might happen that $\sharp Ker \rho \geq 3$, but $\sharp Ker \pi\leq 2$. $\endgroup$ – makt May 3 '17 at 10:10
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Oops, you are right, sorry. I missed the "direct summand" part. $\endgroup$ – abx May 3 '17 at 10:20
13
$\begingroup$

I don't have a reference, but here is a short argument. Assume $G<H$ are compact groups (in our example take $H=\text{O}(n)$) and recall that unitary representations of compact groups are completely reducible. Recall also that by Peter-Weyl every irreducible unitary representation is finite dimensional.

Assume first that $\rho$ is an irreducible finite dimensional continuous representation of $G$ and endow it with a $G$-invariant inner product. Fix $\pi$ to be any finite dimensional subrepresentation of the unitary induction $\text{Ind}_G^H(\rho)$, eg an irreducible subrepresentation. Then, by Frobenius reciprocity, $\text{Hom}_G(\rho,\text{Res}_G^H \pi)\simeq \text{Hom}_H(\text{Ind}_G^H(\rho),\pi)$ and the latter is non-empty by our choice of $\pi$. It follows that $\rho$ is a direct summand of $\text{Res}_G^H \pi$ by its irreducibility.

The case of a general $\rho$, continuous finite dimensional representation, follows easily.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you. While $Res_G^H\pi$ is infinite dimensional, but it is easy to truncate it to imbed $\rho$ to a finite dimensional representation. $\endgroup$ – makt May 3 '17 at 13:27
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @salev, no. We choose $\pi$ to be finite dimensional and restriction does not change the underlying space (I used the notation $\text{Res}_G^H$ for the restriction of a representation from $H$ to $G$, as is common). Maybe I should add: the fact that I could choose $\pi$ to be finite dimensional follows from Peter-Weyl, eg take $\pi$ to be an irreducible $H$ rep. $\endgroup$ – Uri Bader May 3 '17 at 13:39
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, you are right. I misunderstood. $\endgroup$ – makt May 3 '17 at 13:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.