Let $\gamma$ be the Euler-Mascheroni constant. Why is $\gamma$ not a Liouville number? Are there any upper bounds for the irrationality measure of $\gamma$ known?

Any pointers to the literature are welcome. I don't find much on this topic online. Thanks.

  • $\begingroup$ Many terms of the continued fraction of $\gamma$ has been computed. oeis.org/A002852 it doesn't look like it's particularly well-approximated by rationals so it's almost certainly not a Liouville number. $\endgroup$ Apr 30, 2017 at 23:52

1 Answer 1


At the present time, we do not even know how to prove that the Euler-Mascheroni constant $\gamma=\lim_{n\to\infty} \sum_{k=1}^n\frac{1}{k} - \log n$ is irrational, much less transcendental; although it is conjectured to be transcendental. The reason you won't find a lot about this topic online (or in the research literature) is because so little is known about the algebraic properties of $\gamma$.

There is an analgoue of the Euler-Mascheroni constant for Carlitz modules, and I know that there are many transcendence results in the Carlitz (and Drin'feld and T)-module universe that aren't currently provable over number fields. See for example

Tensor Powers of the Carlitz Module and Zeta Values, Greg W. Anderson; Dinesh S. Thakur, The Annals of Mathematics, 2nd Ser., Vol. 132, No. 1. (Jul., 1990), pp. 159-191.

But I don't know if irrationality (or transcendence) has even been proven in that setting.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, Prof. Silverman. I will look at the Carlitz modules. Even if it is unknown that $\gamma$ is irrational, one might establish that $\gamma$ is not a Liouville number independently. $\endgroup$ May 1, 2017 at 9:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.