12
$\begingroup$

A Sasakian manifold is often said to be the odd dimensional analogue of a Kähler manifold.

Now for a $2n$-dimensional Kähler manifold we know from Atiyah that it is spin exactly if the line bundle $\Omega^{(0,n)}$ admits a square root ${\cal S}$, and a choice of spin structure is equivalent to a choice of holomorphic structure ${\cal S}$. In this case the associated spinor bundle is the tensor product of ${\cal S}$ with the anti-holomorphic complex. Moreover, the associated Dirac operator is the tensor product of $\overline{\partial} + \overline{\partial}^*$ with the $\overline{\partial}$-operator corresponding to the choice of holomorphic structure.

So does the above analogy present any Sasakian versions of these spin geometry to complex geometry dictionary?

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Every Sasakian manifold $M$ (of dimension $2k+1$) has a canonical $\mathrm{Spin}^c$ structure, because the cone $\overline{M}$ over $M$ is Kähler and thus has a canonical $\mathrm{Spin}^c$ structure which restricts to $\mathrm{Spin}^c$ structure on $M$.

If $M$ is Einstein, then the cone $\overline{M}$ is Ricci flat and that in turn implies that the auxiliary bundle $\Lambda^{k+1, 0} \overline{M}$ of the canonical $\mathrm{Spin}^c$ structure on the cone $\overline{M}$ is flat. Now $\mathrm{Spin}^c$ structures on simply connected manifolds with trivial auxiliary bundle is canonically identified with a spin strucutre.

For more details see Moroianu, Andrei: Parallel and Killing spinors on $Spin^c$ manifolds, Comm. Math. Phys. 187 (1997), no. 2, 417–427

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.