15
$\begingroup$

Assume That $U,V$ are two filters on the natural number $\mathbb{N}$. We say that $U$ is equivalent to $V$ if there is a bijection $\phi: \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{N}$ such that $\tilde{\phi}(U)=V$ where $\tilde{\phi}:P(\mathbb{N}) \to P(\mathbb{N})$ is the natural extension of $\phi$ to the power set $P(\mathbb{N})$. Let $U,V$ be two non principal ultra filter on $\mathbb{N}$.

Let $\mathbb{R}^*_{U}$ and $\mathbb{R}^*_{V}$ be the corresponding nonstandard extension of real numbers associated with $U$ and $V$, respectively.

Assume that $\mathbb{R}^*_{U}$ and $\mathbb{R}^*_{V}$ are isomorphic as fields. Does this imply that $U$ and $V$ are equivalent filters?

My apology in advance, if the question is elementary. The question arose me about 17 years ago when I was trying to understand the application of non standard analysis to ordinary differential equations.

$\endgroup$
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ I think it's known that under CH, all ultrapowers $\mathbb{R}_U$ are isomorphic. Maybe somebody more familiar known more about this. $\endgroup$ – YCor Apr 11 '17 at 9:34
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ A question that addresses the result mentioned by YCor can be found here. $\endgroup$ – Michael Greinecker Apr 11 '17 at 11:03
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Just to finish the proof, there are always nonequivalent nonprincipal ultrafilters (since there are $2^{2^{\aleph_0}}$-many nonprincipal ultrafilters on $\mathbb{N}$ and only $2^{\aleph_0}$-many bijections from $\mathbb{N}$ to itself), so under CH the answer is no. But I think the answer is probably no just in ZFC. $\endgroup$ – Paul McKenney Apr 12 '17 at 18:11
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Some articles related to this can be found in this MSE post. There are $2^c$ ultrafilters but also $2^c$ non-isomorphic fields when $\neg CH$, so straightforward "counting" does not seem to allow one to decide. $\endgroup$ – Mikhail Katz Apr 19 '17 at 12:02
  • $\begingroup$ math.stackexchange.com/a/280935/72694 is a related answer by @AndreasBlass. $\endgroup$ – Mikhail Katz Apr 19 '17 at 13:38
4
$\begingroup$

As far as I understand the question is still open under $\neg CH$, namely whether isomorphism of hyperreal fields implies equivalence of filters (up to permutation of index set). Perhaps one can try the following approach.

In a universe $V$ satisfying $CH$, we can take two inequivalent filters and obtain fields that are automatically isomorphic by the result of Erdos &Co mentioned in the MSE post linked in the comments above. Now the idea is to take a forcing extension $V^F$ satisfying $\neg CH$.

One can't transfer naively the construction of the hyperreal field to $V^F$ because the ultrafilter is not definable, but perhaps one can work with the definable hyperreal field of Kanovei and Shelah (which exploits a huge index set using all ultrafilters simultaneously, thereby defeating non-definability). Perhaps one can specify two variants of the Kanovei-Shelah construction whether the ideals are not equivalent but the quotient fields will be by the Erdos-type argument, and then take a forcing extension to exhibit a similar phenomenon under $\neg CH$.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.