This is a long shot, but I am curious where it leads. First, recall the Dedekind eta function $\eta(\tau)$.

I. Level 6

Define, $$\begin{aligned} j_{6A}(\tau) &= \Big(\sqrt{j_{6B}(\tau)} - \frac{1}{\sqrt{j_{6B}(\tau)}}\Big)^2 \\ j_{6B}(\tau) &= \Big(\tfrac{\eta(2\tau)\,\eta(3\tau)}{\eta(\tau)\,\eta(6\tau)}\Big)^{12}\end{aligned}$$ then, $$\sum_{k=0}^\infty \tbinom{2k}{k}\sum_{j=0}^k\tbinom{k}{j}^3\,\frac1{\big(j_{6A}(\tau)\big)^{k+1/2}}=\sum_{k=0}^\infty \color{blue}{\sum_{j=0}^k\tbinom{k}{j}^2\tbinom{k+j}{j}^2}\,\frac1{\big(j_{6B}(\tau)\big)^{k+1/2}}\tag1$$

where the blue integer sequence $\alpha_k=1,5,73,1445,\dots$ are the Apery numbers. These numbers have the known $3$-term recurrence relation, $$0=k^3\alpha_k-(2k-1)(17k^2-17k+5)\alpha_{k-1}+(k-1)^3\alpha_{k-2}$$ We can use its polynomial coefficient to generate another integer sequence, $$v_k = (2k-1)(17k^2-17k+5)= 5,117,535,1463,\dots$$ which appears in the cfrac of $\zeta(3)$, $$\zeta(3)=\cfrac{6}{5 - \cfrac{1^6}{117 - \cfrac{2^6}{ 535- \cfrac{3^6}{1463-\ddots } }}}$$ and employed (among other means) by Apery to prove the irrationality of $\zeta(3)$.

II. Level 10

Similarly, define, $$\begin{aligned} j_{10A}(\tau) &= \Big(\sqrt{j_{10D}(\tau)} - \frac{1}{\sqrt{j_{10D}(\tau)}}\Big)^2\\ j_{10D}(\tau) &= \Big(\tfrac{\eta(2\tau)\,\eta(5\tau)}{\eta(\tau)\,\eta(10\tau)}\Big)^{6}\end{aligned}$$ then,

$$\sum_{k=0}^\infty \sum_{j=0}^k\tbinom{k}{j}^4\,\frac1{\big(j_{10A}(\tau)\big)^{k+1/2}}=\sum_{k=0}^\infty \color{blue}{\beta_k}\,\frac1{\big(j_{10D}(\tau)\big)^{k+1/2}}\tag2$$ where,

$\small \beta_k = 1, 3, 25, 267, 3249, 42795, 594145, 8563035, 126905185, 1921833075, 29609682273, 462653241939, 7313942412825, 116770179560211, 1880087947627377, 30492738838690395,\dots$

Unfortunately, I don't have a closed-form for $\beta_k$ but one can find arbitrarily many terms.


  1. What is the recurrence relation for $\beta_k$?
  2. This is a long shot: Does its polynomial coefficient somehow appear in the cfrac of $\zeta(5)$?
  • $\begingroup$ The Wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramanujan–Sato_series on Ramanujan-Sato, under "Level 10", mentions your sequence 1,3,25,... and says closed form is not yet known. If it has a polynomial-cefficient recurrence, it is likely of order higher than 2. $\endgroup$ – Gerald Edgar Mar 27 '17 at 16:03
  • $\begingroup$ @GeraldEdgar: I had assumed that, analogous to the Apery numbers, it would be a three-term relation with quintic polynomials, I tried to solve it using Mathematica but couldn't find it. Maybe it involves more than three terms. :( $\endgroup$ – Tito Piezas III Mar 27 '17 at 16:12
  • $\begingroup$ Is there a place where I can get more terms for this? The terms you give are enough to show that there are no low degrees low order recurrences where low is quite low! So I could use a few more terms :) $\endgroup$ – Vladimir Dotsenko Mar 27 '17 at 16:33
  • $\begingroup$ OK ... At level 6 we get a 3-term recurrence and $\zeta(3)$; level 10 we get a 5-term recurrence and maybe $\zeta(5)$. What about level 8, a 4-term recurrence and $\zeta(4)$? Or level 4, a 2-term recurrence, and $\zeta(2)$? $\endgroup$ – Gerald Edgar Mar 28 '17 at 11:50
  • $\begingroup$ @GeraldEdgar: For level 6, the identity $(1)$ involves an integer sequence on the LHS and RHS that both have 3-term recurrences. For level 10, the identity $(2)$ has an integer sequence on the LHS that has a 3-term recurrence, but the RHS (as you found out) has a 5-term one. And similar disparity for level 4. In this sense, level 6 and its relation to $\zeta(3)$ may be unique. :( $\endgroup$ – Tito Piezas III Mar 28 '17 at 12:55

Maple found this recurrence:
(n^4+6*n^3+12*n^2+10*n+3)*beta(n)+(-20*n^4-152*n^3-420*n^2-508*n-229)*beta(n+1)+(38*n^4+380*n^3+1416*n^2+2330*n+1431)*beta(n+2)+(-20*n^4-248*n^3-1140*n^2-2292*n-1689)*beta(n+3)+(n^4+14*n^3+72*n^2+160*n+128)*beta(n+4), beta(0) = 1, beta(1) = 3, beta(2) = 25, beta(3) = 267

\begin{align} 0 = \;&\left( {n}^{4}+6\,{n}^{3}+12\,{n}^{2}+10\,n+3 \right) \beta_n \\& + \left( -20\,{n}^{4}-152\,{n}^{3}-420\,{n}^{2}-508 \,n-229 \right) \beta_{n+1} \\& + \left( 38\,{n}^{4}+380\,{n} ^{3}+1416\,{n}^{2}+2330\,n+1431 \right) \beta_{n+2} \\& + \left( -20\,{n}^{4}-248\,{n}^{3}-1140\,{n}^{2}-2292\,n-1689 \right) \beta_{n+3} \\& + \left( {n}^{4}+14\,{n}^{3}+72\,{n}^{2}+160 \,n+128 \right) \beta_{n+4}, \end{align}

with $\beta_0=1,\beta_1 =3,\beta_2 =25,\beta_3 =267$. Equivalently, by shifting indices

\begin{align}0=&\;(k+1)(k-1)^3\,\beta_{k-2}\\ &+ (-20k^4 + 8k^3 + 12k^2 - 12k + 3)\,\beta_{k-1}\\ &+ (38k^4 + 76k^3 + 48k^2 + 10k + 3)\,\beta_{k}\\ &+ (-20k^4 - 88k^3 - 132k^2 - 68k - 1)\,\beta_{k+1}\\ &+ k(k+2)^3\,\beta_{k+2}\end{align}

P.S. to Vladimir: For more terms that I needed, I used only $$ j_{10A} = j_{10D} + \frac{1}{j_{10D}} - 2 $$

  • $\begingroup$ Whew, that's a beast! $\endgroup$ – user78249 Mar 27 '17 at 17:52
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Very nice! Some remarks: $n^4+6n^3+12n^2+10n+3=(n+1)^3(n+3)$, $n^4+14n^3+72n^2+160n+128=(n+2)(n+4)^3$, other three polynomial coefficients appear to be irreducible. Also, retaining the highest terms in $n$ of the recurrence (like Poincaré would do) gives a constant coefficient recurrence with the characteristic polynomial $t^4-20t^3+38t^2-20t+1=(t-1)^2(t^2-18t+1)$ with roots $1$ of multiplicity two and $(2\pm\sqrt{5})^2$ of multiplicity one. I wonder what the double root $1$ may mean, if anything at all. $\endgroup$ – Vladimir Dotsenko Mar 27 '17 at 18:53
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thanks for this G. Edgar! So while the Apery numbers were a $3$-term recurrence, these involve a $5$-term. Hm... $\endgroup$ – Tito Piezas III Mar 28 '17 at 2:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @VladimirDotsenko: If we do the same for the Apery numbers $\alpha$, the characteristic polynomial is $t^2-34t+1=0$ with root $\sigma^4$ and silver ratio $\sigma$. The limiting ratio of $\displaystyle\frac{\alpha_{k+1}}{\alpha_k}=\sigma^4$. If we do the same for $\beta$, then $(2+\sqrt{5})^2=\phi^6$ with golden ratio $\phi$. I assume then that $\displaystyle\frac{\beta_{k+1}}{\beta_k}=\phi^6$. $\endgroup$ – Tito Piezas III Mar 28 '17 at 2:41
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @Marty: There is the known, $$\zeta(5) = \cfrac{1}{w_1-\cfrac{1^{10}}{w_2-\cfrac{2^{10}}{w_3-\cfrac{3^{10}}{w_4-\ddots}}}}$$ where $w_n = (n-1)^5+n^5 = (2n-1)(n^4-2n^3+4n^2-3n+1) = 1, 33, 275, 1267, \dots$ Unfortunately, no one has yet found an accelerated version analogous to what Apery did for $\zeta(3)$. $\endgroup$ – Tito Piezas III Mar 28 '17 at 17:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.