3
$\begingroup$

Let $E>1$ and consider an annulus in $\mathbb{R}^2$ with outer radius $R=\sqrt{E}$ and inner radius $R=\sqrt{E-1}$.

How many unit cubes do I need to cover the annulus?

The area of a $2$-dimensional annulus does not depend on the outer and inner radius, so one could think that the number of needed cubes depends only on the dimension. However, for growing $E$, the width of the annulus becomes thinner and the length of the inner and outer circumference becomes longer. So it looks to me that the number of cubes grows with $\sqrt{E}$, but I don't really understand how. Can anybody help me in this?

Edit: the squares (not cubes because we are in two dimensions) need to have sides parallel to the $x$ and $y$ axes. Maybe this changes things a little...

$\endgroup$
8
  • $\begingroup$ It will be like many thin curves taking a circuit tour and visiting the four cardinal points: it will take 8R squares, perhaps with a few more squares for cases where the path interior contains a lattice point. You might read up on the Gauss circle problem for more info. Gerhard "Sort Of Like Manhattan Distance" Paseman, 2017.03.24. $\endgroup$ – Gerhard Paseman Mar 24 '17 at 19:36
  • $\begingroup$ Do the squares (I presume you mean that, rather than cubes) need a fixed orientation? If not, the number will be approximately $2 \pi R/\sqrt{2}$. $\endgroup$ – Robert Israel Mar 24 '17 at 19:40
  • $\begingroup$ About $\pi\sqrt{2E}$: look how they cover a big circle. $\endgroup$ – Fedor Petrov Mar 24 '17 at 19:40
  • $\begingroup$ @RobertIsrael I want the squares (yes I mean squares not cubes) to have sides parallel to the coordinate axes. $\endgroup$ – Michela Mar 24 '17 at 20:01
  • $\begingroup$ If the squares have integral coordinates for vertices, then think Manhattan; the reason it won't always be exactly 8R is because sometimes the annulus contains a neighborhood of a lattice point. If the Gauss circle problem applies, current technology will say the true answer is off from 8R by something like R^{2/3}. Gerhard "Think Of Squares, Not Circles" Paseman, 2017.03.24. $\endgroup$ – Gerhard Paseman Mar 24 '17 at 20:30
1
$\begingroup$

Gerhard already mentioned what I'm going to say in a comment, but let me make it explicit anyway: To cover a line of slope $0\le m\le 1$ and length $L\gg 1$, you need about $L/\sqrt{1+m^2}$ unit squares with sides parallel to the axes.

So the part of the circle of radius $R$ with angle between $\alpha$ and $\alpha+d\alpha$ requires $R\, d\alpha/\sqrt{1+\tan^2\alpha}$ unit squares, for a total of $$ \simeq 8R \int_0^{\pi/4} \frac{d\alpha}{\sqrt{1+\tan^2\alpha}} = 8R \int_0^{\pi/4}\cos\alpha\, d\alpha = 4\sqrt{2} R $$ squares to cover the whole circle or (more or less equivalently) the very thin annulus.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.