2
$\begingroup$

In Algebraic Geometry one has a very useful formula for the dimension of fibers. Specifically I am thinking about a statement of the following form:

Let $C$ be a curve over $\mathbb{C}$, and let $S$ be an irreducible constructible subset $S \subset C^n$. Here we take the Zariski topology on $C^n$ and constructible means relatively closed $S \subset_{cl} U \subset_{op} C^n$, irreducible means there are no constructibles $S_1, S_2 \subset_{cl} S$ such that $S = S_1 \cup S_2$ and $S_1 \not\subset S_2$, $S_2 \not\subset S_1$. Let $\pi: C^n \rightarrow C^m$ be a projection. Then $$\dim S = \dim \pi(S) + \min_{a \in \pi(S)} \dim(\pi^{-1}(a) \cap S).$$

I wonder, is there a similar statement for topological dimensions?

In particular, consider a compact Hausdorff space $X$ (or maybe seperable metric or similar) and a projection $\pi : X^n \rightarrow X^m$. For which subsets $S \subset X^n$ do we have $$\dim S = \dim \pi(S) + \min_{a \in \pi(S)} \dim(\pi^{-1}(a) \cap S)?$$

I don't know a lot about topological dimension theory, but some very basic first examples with the unit cube $I^n$ seem to work out for constructible subsets, i.e. locally compact subsets here.

Also note that if $Y \subset X^n$ has $\dim Y = 0$, then $\dim \pi(Y) = 0$ because $\pi$ is continuous open-and-closed.

Any ideas, help, or pointers to literature greatly welcome!

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Your question can be viewed as a general dimension theory question, and it is answered by the standard textbooks on the topological dimension theory.

Indeed, let $\ S\subseteq X^k\ $ be embedded in $\ X^k.\ $ Let $\ f:S\rightarrow X^m\ $ be an arbitrary map. Let $ n:=k+m,\ $ so that $\ X^n\ =\ X^h\times X^m.\ $ Define

$$ S'\ := \{(x\ \ f(x)): x\in S\} $$

Of course $\ S'\ $ is canonically homeomorphic to $\ S.\ $ Consider your projection $\ \pi:X^n\rightarrow X^m.\ $ Then the restriction $\ \pi|S\ $ doesn't differ topologically from f. Thus there is no gain or difference from considering a projection as opposed to a general continuous map.

Let's remember that finite d-dimensional metric compact spaces can be embedded into $\ \mathbb I^{2\cdot d+1}\ $ (hence into $\ \mathbb R^{2\cdot d+1}$).

Two kinds of examples to keep in mind:

A.Kolmogorov provided the following (or something better?): glue together the end-points of the removed open intervals of the standard Cantor set. Then your space (the Cantor set) has dimension $\ 0,\ $ and the "fibers" (call them "fibers" in the context of your Question) have dimension $\ 0\ $ (they are single points or 2-point sets), while the "base" i.e. the image of the given surjection, has dimension $\ 1,\ $ hence $\ 0 < 0+1$.

L.Pontryagin provided a pair of 2-dim metric compacta for which their product has dimension $\ 3,\ $ and V. Boltyansky has obtained even sharper examples where that pair of such compacta were homeomorphic.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much for your reply! Although I am not sure your example of Kolmogorov would contradict the fiber dimension formula. Let $S = \mathcal{C} \subset [0,1] = X$ be the Cantor set, and let $f: S \rightarrow X$ be the map you describe by glueing endpoints of the removed open intervals. Then the corresponding projection as you mention in the first part would be $\pi : \{ (x,f(x)) \; : \; x \in S \} \rightarrow X$ where $\pi((x, f(x))) = f(x)$. Hence $\dim \pi(S') = \dim \pi(S \times f(S)) = \dim f(S) = 1$ and equality holds. Or do I miss something? $\endgroup$ – Niki Mar 27 '17 at 12:43
  • $\begingroup$ I am a bit confused, something cannot be right here because if $\dim S' = 0$ then $\dim \pi(S') = 0$ as mentioned above because $\pi$ is continuous open and closed. $\endgroup$ – Niki Mar 27 '17 at 13:39

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.