Let $A$ be a unital C*-algebra.

Let me define its "$K$-theory space" to be the image of its $K$-theory spectrum under the functor $\Omega^\infty:$ Spectra $\to$ Spaces. I denote the $K$-theory space of $A$ by $K(A)$.

Let $\mathcal K$ be the C*-algebra of compact operators on an infinite dimensional Hilbert space (usually taken to be separable).

Write $Pr(A \otimes \mathcal K)$ for the space of projections in $A \otimes \mathcal K$. This is an $E_\infty$-space with respect to the operation of direct sum (the latter involves reshuffling the coordinates on $\mathcal K$)

Question: Is $K(A)$ equivalent to the group completion of $Pr(A \otimes \mathcal K)$?

I'm being told by Ulrich Pennig that the above statement is false for non-unital algebras, as there exist non-unital C*-algebras which are stably projectionless. They contain no projections, even after forming the tensor product with $\mathcal K$. ($C_0(\mathbb R)$ is such an algebra.)

  • $\begingroup$ Do you have a "natural" map $Pr(A\otimes\mathcal{K})\rightarrow K(A)$? $\endgroup$
    – mathphys
    Mar 22 '17 at 22:31
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I am puzzled by the down-vote... Does someone think my question is too easy? $\endgroup$ Mar 24 '17 at 8:08
  • $\begingroup$ I don't understand it either. I think this is a perfectly fine question. $\endgroup$ Mar 24 '17 at 12:07

The fundamental observation is that $\pi_1$ of the $E_\infty$-space $Pr(A\otimes \mathcal K)$ is stably abelian.

(Here "stably abelian" means that for any connected component $Y\subset Pr(A\otimes \mathcal K)$, and any pair of loops $a,b\in\pi_1(Y)$, there exists an element $p\in Pr(A\otimes \mathcal K)$ such that $p\oplus a$ and $p\oplus b$ commute in $\pi_1(p\oplus Y)$.)

Given the above fact, the group completion of $Pr(A\otimes \mathcal K)$ can be computed as an infinite telescope: $$ Pr(A\otimes \mathcal K)^{gr}=\mathrm{hocolim} Pr(A\otimes \mathcal K) $$ with respect to the self-map $1_A\oplus- :Pr(A\otimes \mathcal K)\to Pr(A\otimes \mathcal K)$.

(For more general $E_\infty$-spaces, one also needs to perform a Quillen's plus-construction, after having done the infinite telescope.)

Given a compact topological space $X$, mapping out of $X$ commutes with the formation of filtered homotopy colimits. We therefore have: $$ [X,Pr(A\otimes \mathcal K)^{gr}]= [X,\mathrm{hocolim} Pr(A\otimes \mathcal K)]= \mathrm{colim} [X,Pr(A\otimes \mathcal K)]= [X,Pr(A\otimes \mathcal K)]^{gr}. $$

Now, we may identify the space of maps from $X$ to $Pr(A\otimes \mathcal K)$ with the space of projections in the C*-algebra $C(X,A\otimes \mathcal K)=C(X,A)\otimes \mathcal K$. We therefore have $$ [X,Pr(A\otimes \mathcal K)]= \pi_0(\mathrm{Map}(X,Pr(A\otimes \mathcal K)))= \pi_0(Pr(C(X,A)\otimes \mathcal K)), $$ and so $$ [X,Pr(A\otimes \mathcal K)^{gr}]= [X,Pr(A\otimes \mathcal K)]^{gr}= \pi_0(Pr(C(X,A)\otimes \mathcal K))^{gr}. $$ The latter is, by definition, $K_0(C(X,A))=[X,K(A)]$.

At last, by the Yoneda lemma, the equation $$ [X,Pr(A\otimes \mathcal K)^{gr}]=[X,K(A)] $$ implies the desired homotopy equivalence $Pr(A\otimes \mathcal K)^{gr}\approx K(A)$.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The application of Yoneda is dubious: you only established the bijection for compact X. $\endgroup$ Apr 3 '17 at 11:06
  • $\begingroup$ @Oscar. You're right. But I feel that the argument is fixable. The infinity-category of spaces is the ind-category of the infinity-category of compact spaces. So the homotopy type of a space is completely remembered by the presheaf it induces on compact spaces. Now, the map $Ho([$compact spaces, spaces$])\to [Ho($compact spaces$),Ho($spaces$)]$ is not an equivalence of categories, but I seem to remember that it is full (the kernel consisting of phantom maps). $\endgroup$ Apr 3 '17 at 13:50
  • $\begingroup$ @OscarRandal-Williams : are there spaces $Y_1$ and $Y_2$ which are not homotopy equivalent, but which induce isomorphic presheaves on $Ho($compact spaces$)$? I.e. such that $[X,Y_1]\cong [X,Y_2]$, naturally in $X$? $\endgroup$ Apr 3 '17 at 20:28
  • $\begingroup$ I can't see how to build any, but I can't see how to rule it out either. $\endgroup$ Apr 3 '17 at 21:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.