Let $X$ be a scheme and let $D_{qoch}(X)$ and $D^b_{coh}(X)$ be the unbounded derived category of quasi-coherent sheaves and bounded derived category of coherent sheaves on $X$, respectively.

$D^b_{coh}(X)$ is closely related to the geometry of $X$ and has been intensively studied, see for example Huybrechts's book. On the other hand, $D_{qcoh}(X)$ has also been studied but its categorical structure is more complicated. For example, the injective resolutions in $D_{qcoh}(X)$ are actually h-injective complexes and more difficult to construct than the injective resolutions $D^b_{coh}(X)$.

My question is: is there any place that $D_{qcoh}(X)$ rather than $D^b_{coh}(X)$ plays an essential role? By "essential" I mean that $D_{qcoh}(X)$ is more than just an auxiliary tool.

  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Certain functors do not necessarily restrict to the bounded derived category. That's a pretty important reason to consider the unbounded derived category if you ask me. $\endgroup$ – pbelmans Mar 12 '17 at 20:19
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @pbelmans Among the Grothendieck's six functors, it seems that the pushforward does not exist in the bounded derived category of coherent sheaves. Is that what you mean? $\endgroup$ – Zhaoting Wei Mar 12 '17 at 20:24
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The underlying $\infty$-category of $D_{qcoh}(X)$ is presentable, but the underlying $\infty$-category of $D_{qcoh}^b(X)$ is not (it doesn't have all limits and colimits). $\endgroup$ – Yonatan Harpaz Mar 12 '17 at 20:39
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ The push-forward may take complexes of coherent sheaves to complexes of quasi-coherent sheaves. The pull-back may take bounded complexes to unbounded ones. $\endgroup$ – Leonid Positselski Mar 12 '17 at 23:44
  • 6

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.