14
$\begingroup$

$M$ is non-Kähler complex manifold. Assume that $\omega$ is $\partial$-exact and $\bar\partial$-exact $(p,q)$-form.

Question. Is $\omega$ also $\partial\bar\partial$-exact?

Based on fabulous David Speyer's answer to this MO question I suspect that the answer is elementary or very hard.

$\endgroup$
10
$\begingroup$

I think that the answer is in general no and that a counterexample can be constructed as follows. I will refer to the paper by D. Angella, G. Dloussky, A. Tomassini

On Bott-Chern cohomology of compact complex surfaces, Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata 195 (2016), pp 199–217.

Let us consider a non-Kähler surface $S$ of Inoue type. Then we have (see Table 1 p. 210 of the aforementioned paper) $$h^{1, \, 1}_{\bar{\partial}}(S)=0, \quad \textrm{hence} \quad h^{1, \, 1}_{\partial}(S)=0 \quad (\spadesuit) $$ where the second equality is obtained by conjugation and duality induced by the Hodge $\ast$-operator associated to a given Hermitian metric.

Moreover, we have $$h^{1, \,1}_{\textrm{BC}}(S)=1 \quad (\clubsuit)$$ where $h^{\bullet, \, \bullet}_{\textrm{BC}}$ denotes the dimension of Bott-Chern cohomology group $H^{\bullet, \, \bullet}_{\textrm{BC}}$, namely $$H^{\bullet, \, \bullet}_{\textrm{BC}}(S) = \frac{\ker \partial \cap \ker \bar{\partial}}{\mathrm{im}\, \partial \bar{\partial}} .$$

Now, $(\clubsuit)$ means that there exists a $(1, \, 1)$-form $\omega$ on $S$ which is both $\partial$-closed and $\bar{\partial}$-closed, but not $\partial \bar{\partial}$-exact.

On the other hand, $(\spadesuit)$ implies that any $\partial$-closed (resp. $\bar{\partial}$-closed) $(1,\, 1)$-form on $S$ is actually $\partial$-exact (respectively, $\bar{\partial}$-exact).

Summing up, $\omega$ is a $(1, \, 1)$-form on $S$ which is both $\partial$-exact and $\bar{\partial}$-exact, but not $\partial \bar{\partial}$-exact.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Beautiful reasoning. Actually Angella's work led to this question. I read one of his paper and I found Bott-Chern/Aeppli cohomology interesting. $\endgroup$ – Fallen Apart Feb 7 '17 at 16:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.