1
$\begingroup$

On line 7 of page 61 of the book a guide to quantum groups, a Poisson bracket is defined on $\mathbb{C}[GL_n]$ for every classical $r$-matrix as follows.

Let $V$ be a vector space with a basis $v_1, \ldots, v_n$, and $r \in \mathfrak{g} \otimes \mathfrak{g}$ is a skew-symmetric classical $r$-matrix. Suppose that \begin{align} r(v_i \otimes v_j) = \sum_{k,l} r_{ij}^{(kl)} v_k \otimes v_l, \end{align} for some $r_{ij}^{(kl)} \in \mathbb{C}$.

Define \begin{align} \{c_{i j}, c_{kl}\} = \sum_{s,s'} r_{s',s}^{(j l)} c_{ks} c_{i s'} - \sum_{s, s' } r_{ik}^{(s' s)} c_{s' j} c_{s l}, \ i,j,k,l = 1,2, \ldots, n. \quad (1) \end{align} Here $c_{ij}$ are natural coordinates on $\mathbb{C}[GL_n]$. By using classical $r$-matrix \begin{align} \sum_{s} (r_{sj}^{(s_3s_4)} r_{ik}^{(ss_2)} - r_{sk}^{(s_3s_2)} r_{ij}^{(ss_4)} + r_{is}^{(s_3s_4)} r_{jk}^{(ss_2)} - r_{sk}^{(s_4s_2)} r_{ij}^{(s_3s)} + r_{is}^{(s_3s_2)} r_{jk}^{(s_4s)} - r_{js}^{(s_4s_2)} r_{ik}^{(s_3s)}) =0 \end{align} and \begin{align} r_{ij}^{(kl)} = - r_{ji}^{(lk)}, \end{align} we can show that the bracket defined by (1) is Poisson. Is it possible to modify (1) such that it is a super Poisson bracket on $\mathbb{C}[GL(m|n)]$? Thank you very much.

Improve this question
$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
1
$\begingroup$

I think that it is done in the paper of Andruskiewitsch "Lie superbialgebras and Poisson-Lie supergroups", Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Universität Hamburg 63 (1993), 147-163, http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02941339 (the key result is Proposition 3 in that paper).

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
8
  • $\begingroup$ thank you very much. Do you know thank you very much for the reference. How to write the formula in "Lie superbialgebras and Poisson-Lie supergroups" using coordinates $c_{ij}$ in the case of $GL(m|n)$? I tried but the formula I get didn't satisfy super commutativity. I asked this question in the post. $\endgroup$
    – Jianrong Li
    Feb 7, 2017 at 14:50
  • $\begingroup$ @JianrongLi it would help to know what exactly you tried. Maybe you can include it in that new question you posted. $\endgroup$
    – Vladimir Dotsenko
    Feb 7, 2017 at 15:08
  • $\begingroup$ thank you very much. First I tried to verify the super anti commutativity. I tried to do the computations in another post. But I don't know how to prove that \begin{align} & (-1)^{|\psi||\phi| + |\psi||\mu| + |\mu||\nu| + |R_{\nu }\psi | | R_{\mu} \phi| + |\phi| |\nu| } = 1, \\ & (-1)^{|\psi||\phi| + |\psi||\mu| + |\mu||\nu| + |L_{\nu }\psi | | L_{\mu} \phi| + |\phi| |\nu| } = 1. \end{align} $\endgroup$
    – Jianrong Li
    Feb 7, 2017 at 15:24
  • $\begingroup$ @JianrongLi Note that $|R_\mu\phi|=|\phi|+|\mu|$, because $R_\mu\phi$ is the result of $\mu$ acting on $\phi$, and action respects the grading. I think that this property, and the same for the right-invariant operators $L_\mu$, completely resolves your concern. $\endgroup$
    – Vladimir Dotsenko
    Feb 7, 2017 at 15:31
  • $\begingroup$ thank you very much. Yes, your answer solved my problem. $\endgroup$
    – Jianrong Li
    Feb 7, 2017 at 15:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.