8
$\begingroup$

It is well known that a set of natural transformations can be expressed as an end:

$$\int_{A \in \mathcal{A}} \mathcal{B}(FA, GA) =_{\operatorname{Set}} \operatorname{Nat}(F, G)$$ This holds for functors $F, G \colon \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B}$.

Now in polymorphic lambda calculus (such as System F), there is a very similar phenomenon. Terms satisfy free theorems. As a special case of this, terms of type $\forall A. F A \to G A$ satisfy naturality. Now if we interpret this statement with semantics in $\operatorname{Set}$, it seems like well-typed terms of the above type again correspond to natural transformations from $F$ to $G$!

In Martin-Löf type theory, a similar statement should hold for types of the form $\Pi_{A : \operatorname{Set}} F A \to G A$.

Is there a connection between ends and parametricity? E.g. are ends the semantics of polymorphic types (or $\Pi$-types)?

Bonus: Is there a similar phenomenon for coends? (E.g. $\Sigma$-types or existential quantification?)

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.