1
$\begingroup$

It is well known that if $T$ is a nonsingular transformation of a standard probability space $(X,\mu)$ and there exists an ergodic measure preserving transformation $S$ of $(X,\mu)$ such that $T$ commutes with $S$, then $T$ is measure preserving.

I would like to know of there is an approximate version of this fact. More explicitly, let $T$ be a nonsingular transformation of $(X,\mu)$ and suppose that for some small $\epsilon$ there exists an ergodic nonsingular tranformation $S$ which commutes with $T$ and such that there is a set $A \subseteq X$ with $\mu(A) > 1-\epsilon$ and $\frac{\mathrm{d}S \mu}{\mathrm{d}\mu}(x) = 1$ for all $x \in A$. Does this imply that $T$ is close to being measure preserving in some sense, for example do we have that the quantity $||\frac{\mathrm{d}T \mu}{\mathrm{d}\mu} - 1||_1$ or the quantity $- \int_X \log \frac{\mathrm{d}T \mu}{\mathrm{d}\mu}(x) \hspace{2 pt} \mathrm{d}\mu(x)$ is small?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I didn't know the result you're quoting. Do you have a reference? $\endgroup$ – Anthony Quas Jan 28 '17 at 15:58
  • $\begingroup$ @AnthonyQuas: I don't think this is right. What if $T$ is a shift on $\{ 0, 1 \}^{\mathbb Z}$, $S=T^2$, and $\mu$ is supported by the sequences that are $0$ at the odd digits (and is the usual product measure on the other half)? $\endgroup$ – Christian Remling Jan 28 '17 at 17:15
  • $\begingroup$ @ChristianRemling: Then the map $T$ is singular (I had already thought about cases like this: another nice example is $\mu$ is a $(\frac 13,\frac 23)$ Bernoulli measure and $T$ swaps 0's and 1's; of course $T$ is singular in that case too). $\endgroup$ – Anthony Quas Jan 28 '17 at 17:52
  • $\begingroup$ @AnthonyQuas: Well, that demonstrates that I don't know what "singular" means here. $\endgroup$ – Christian Remling Jan 28 '17 at 18:01
  • $\begingroup$ Singular means $\mu(A)=0$ implies $\mu(T^{-1}A)=0$. $\endgroup$ – Anthony Quas Jan 28 '17 at 18:10
0
$\begingroup$

No. I don't think there can be any result of that type. Let $X=\{0,1\}^{\mathbb N}$ and let $S$ be the dyadic odometer (I like to write elements of $X$ so they are infinite on the left; in this case, the map $S$ is just add 1 with carry to the left -- the way it should be!). Equip $X$ with the measure that is the product measure of $(\frac 12,\frac 12)$ on each coordinate except the $N$th; and $(\epsilon,1-\epsilon)$ on the $N$th coordinate. Let $T$ be $S^{2^N}$. Then $S$ is measure preserving everywhere except on a set of measure $2^{-N}$: the cylinder set $[111111111]$, while $T$ is very far from measure-preserving everywhere.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, this makes intuitive sense. I was mostly concerned with the situation where $S$ and $T$ generate a free action of $\mathbb{Z}^2$, but upon further reflection I doubt the desired statement holds even in that case. $\endgroup$ – burtonpeterj Jan 28 '17 at 22:50
  • $\begingroup$ Right. It's not hard to make $T$ be a different rotation in the odometer group that has the same property, but where the action of $S$ and $T$ is free. $\endgroup$ – Anthony Quas Jan 28 '17 at 23:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.