3
$\begingroup$

Let $n\ge 2r$ be positive integers.
Is there a closed form for following finite summation involving in q-binomial coefficients $$\sum_{s=0}^r(-1)^sq^{\frac{s(s+1)}{2}}{n-2r+s\brack n-2r}_q{n\brack r-s}_q\,\,\,\,\,\, ?$$ I found this while studying q-Fibonacci/ Lucas polynomials.
What is the general approach for evaluating this type of series?
Any suggestion would be appreciated.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What is your definition of $\big[..\big]_q$ ? $\endgroup$ – Konstantinos Kanakoglou Jan 23 '17 at 1:10
  • $\begingroup$ I use the definition $[n]_q=1+q+q^2+\cdots+q^{n-1}$ for q-integers . $\endgroup$ – Bumblebee Jan 23 '17 at 1:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Out of curiosity: where did you find this sum? I mean did you find it mentioned in some paper or is it a byproduct of some calculations of yours? It would be helpful to add some more context. $\endgroup$ – Konstantinos Kanakoglou Jan 23 '17 at 2:04
  • $\begingroup$ I an also very curious about the sum - it looks like the major index statistic on some family of lattice paths with some restriction (using inclusion-exclusion)... $\endgroup$ – Per Alexandersson Jan 26 at 22:33
6
$\begingroup$

Doron Zeilberger has written a Maple code for checking and proving ordinary binomial identities and their $q$-analogues. What you need in the present case is the package called qEKHAD.

I just tested your sum and it leads to a quadratic recurrence in $r$, so you may not expect a closed form as an answer. The lucky cases are linear recurrences in the "external" parameter (here, it is $r$). The latter situation fits the so-called Wilf-Zeilberger pair.

I also sought for other factors $q^{\mu(s)}$ instead of $q^{\binom{s+1}2}$, none of the usual suspects lead to a closed form. Sorry.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your help. I am tring to simplify this summation bit further. Numerical values suggest that above sum equal to $\sum_{s=0}^{r-1}(-1)^{s+1}q^{\frac{s(s+1)}{2}}{n-2r+s\brack n-2r}_q{n\brack r-s-1}_q.$ And also I fund that this equality holds for ordinary binomial coefficients (in which $q=1$). Do you think that they are actually equals for q-binomials? $\endgroup$ – Bumblebee Jan 23 '17 at 3:10
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I just checked: the two sums satisfy the same quadratic recurrence (in $n$) and matching initial conditions. They are indeed equal. $\endgroup$ – T. Amdeberhan Jan 23 '17 at 3:56
  • $\begingroup$ I found this paper by Wilf and Zeilberger. Does the same algorithm works for q-analogies? $\endgroup$ – Bumblebee Jan 24 '17 at 1:32
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, it does work the same way. $\endgroup$ – T. Amdeberhan Jan 24 '17 at 1:34

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.