Let $S$ be a (unit) sphere in a Hilbert Space $H$ with $\dim H \ge 3$. Let $A \subset S$ have the following properties:

  1. $A$ is connected;

  2. The affine hull of $A$ is the whole space;

  3. For every $x,y\in A$ there is a unitary operator $T:H\to H$ (or, alternatively, an isometry $T:S\to S$), such that $TA=A$, and such that $Tx=y$.

Is it true that $A=S$?

You can assume that $A$ with the induced strong or weak topology is locally compact and locally linearly connected if needed.

I think that the problem may be meaningful even in dimension $3$, where it would be nice to have an elementary solution.

The problem I have started with is slightly more general, in case of the affirmative answer for this one, there may be a follow-up.

Thank you.

  • $\begingroup$ In dimension 3 (2-sphere), it easy to see that $A$ should be dense (discussing on the closure of the isometry group). Under the local compactness assumption, it should easily follow that $A$ is the whole sphere. In general, I'm less sure. $\endgroup$ – YCor Jan 3 '17 at 16:19
  • $\begingroup$ @YCor: could you please explain the argument about the closure of the isometry group? Also, I wonder if density, homogeneity and connectedness may imply closeness without local compactness. $\endgroup$ – erz Jan 3 '17 at 18:56
  • $\begingroup$ Oops I was meaning the 3-dim real Hilbert space (and orthogonal maps). If you mean complex Hilbert space I have no claim. $\endgroup$ – YCor Jan 3 '17 at 20:37
  • $\begingroup$ In real dim 3, let $G$ the group of orthogonals preserving $A$. Then $G$ is transitive on $A$. By compactness, it follows that the closure $G'$ of $G$ is transitive on the closure $A'$ of $A$. If $G'$ contains $SO(3)$ it follows that $A'$ is the whole sphere. Otherwise $G'$ is either finite (and hence $A'$ is finite, hence a singleton by connectedness), or $G'$ is up to index 2 a group of rotations. Its orbits are circles, pairs of circles or of points. By connectedness it's a circle or a point, but then its affine hull is not the whole space, contradiction. $\endgroup$ – YCor Jan 3 '17 at 20:38
  • $\begingroup$ How did you deduce these two alternatives for $G'$(either finite, or up to index 2 a group of rotations)? Is this where the dimension $3$ come into the picture? $\endgroup$ – erz Jan 3 '17 at 23:53

The answer is 'no'.

For example, let $H$ be the (5-dimensional) space of symmetric, traceless $3$-by-$3$ matrices, where the Hilbert inner product is $\langle x,y\rangle = \tfrac12\mathrm{tr}(xy)$. Let $A\subset S$ be the subset consisting of those matrices of unit norm for which $0$ is an eigenvalue. Then $A$ is connected and $\mathrm{SO}(3)$ acts transitively on $A$ by the action $g\cdot x = gxg^T$. Moreover, the affine hull of $A$ must be a linear subspace of $H$ containing $A$ that is invariant under the action of $\mathrm{SO}(3)$, and this implies that this affine hull is all of $H$.

More generally, if $G$ is a connected compact Lie group acting irreducibly by isometries on a (finite-dimensional) Hilbert space $H$, then each of the orbits of $G$ in the unit sphere $S\subset H$ will be a subset $A\subset S$ with the OP's desired properties, and such orbits will not be all of $S$ whenever $G$ does not act transitively on $S$.

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for the answer. Is it possible to extend this construction (described in the last paragraph) to the infinite-dimensional case? I understand that compactness should be dropped, but maybe the group action can still be a homeomorphism in both variables? $\endgroup$ – erz Jan 5 '17 at 3:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.