3
$\begingroup$

I am looking for the spectrum of th inverted oscillator $H=-\frac{d^2}{dx^2}-x^2$.

Thanks in advance.

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ $H$ has a continuous spectrum. What do you like to know? $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 26, 2016 at 21:01
  • $\begingroup$ So what is its continuous spectrum? $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 26, 2016 at 21:07
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0703234 $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 26, 2016 at 21:10
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Thank you for the article, i am looking for a mathematical study on the spectrum, if you have it please give it to me $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 26, 2016 at 21:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @FadilKikawi Why don't you follow up on the references given in the article that was cited before you ask followup questions here? $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 27, 2016 at 2:21

2 Answers 2

5
$\begingroup$

The question is only precise once a self-adjointness domain is spelled out for $H$. One way to do this is to regard $H$ as infinitesimal generator of the metaplectic representation in $L^2(\mathbf R)$ of a one-parameter subgroup of (the double cover of) $\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbf R)$. Then its spectrum is the whole real line, with multiplicity 2 and parabolic cylinder functions as (generalized, non-square integrable) eigenfunctions. This is described with increasing detail in Kalnins-Miller (1974, p. 1733); Wolf (1976, p. 604); Wolf (1979, pp. 321-328, 347, 392).

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ I would be very grateful if you can give me the links of your proposals documentations $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 27, 2016 at 19:14
  • $\begingroup$ @FadilKikawi ima.umn.edu/~miller/bibli.html fis.unam.mx/~bwolf/resources.html $\endgroup$ Commented Dec 27, 2016 at 19:54
  • $\begingroup$ Please specify the links of the documentations about the "is to regard $H$ as infinitesimal generator of the metaplectic representation in $L^2(R)$. Thank you very much $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 6, 2017 at 12:02
  • $\begingroup$ @FadilKikawi That was just my way of saying it quickly -- those papers use other methods of specifying the domain; please refer to them. The point is that you must specify it somehow, otherwise your problem is totally ill-defined. (Who's to say you're not considering "$-d^2/dx^2 -x^2$" on polynomials, or polynomials times $\exp(ix^2/2)$, or smooth functions on $(3,7)$, or whatever? That can change the answer completely.) $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 6, 2017 at 16:21
5
$\begingroup$

The operator (on $L^2(\mathbb R)$) has purely absolutely continuous spectrum $\sigma_{ac}=(-\infty,\infty)$ of multiplicity $2$. I don't think that's very easy to see, and it definitely depends on the specifics of the situation; for example, if we make the potential more negative still, then the operator will be in the limit circle case and the spectrum becomes discrete.

I'll give a sketch, but this will not be very detailed. I suggest to analyze the ODE $-y''-x^2y = Ey$ asymptotically. This is a standard procedure, but it will require some calculations. Let $Y=(y,y')^t$, so $Y'=\bigl(\begin{smallmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ E+x^2 & 0\end{smallmatrix}\bigr)Y$, and write $Y= TZ$, where $$ T=\begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ i\omega & - i\omega \end{pmatrix} , \quad\quad \omega = \sqrt{E+x^2}, $$ is chosen such that it diagonalizes the coefficient matrix. We find that $$ Z' = \begin{pmatrix} i\omega + g & -g \\ -g & -i\omega +g \end{pmatrix} Z, \quad\quad g(x) = \frac{\omega'}{2\omega} = \frac{x}{2(E+x^2)} . $$ Next, write $Z=(1+Q)U$, so $U$ solves $$ Q'U + (1+Q)U' = i\omega \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0\\ 0 & -1 \end{pmatrix}(1+Q)U + g\begin{pmatrix} 1 & -1 \\ -1 & 1 \end{pmatrix} (1+Q)U . $$ We now choose $Q$ as a solution of $$ Q' = i\omega (DQ-QD) - g \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix} Q, \quad\quad D= \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0\\ 0 & -1 \end{pmatrix} . $$ This can be solved explicitly, and we then see that we can in fact choose a solution $Q(x) = O(\omega^{-1/2})= O(x^{-1/2})$. This simplifies matters considerably if we are willing to ignore $L^1$ terms: $U$ solves $$ U'= \left[ \begin{pmatrix} i\omega + g & 0 \\ 0 &-i\omega + g \end{pmatrix} + R \right] U, \quad\quad R\in L^1 . $$ Now Levinson's theorem on the asymptotic integration of such systems gives us basis solutions of the form $U=e_j \omega^{1/2} e^{\pm i\alpha(x)}(1+o(1))$. We go back to $y$ and obtain two solutions of the form $y\simeq \omega(x)^{1/2}e^{\pm i\alpha(x)}$. Since all solutions are asymptotically of the same size, my claims about the spectrum follow (by the subordinacy theory).

$\endgroup$
0

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .