6
$\begingroup$

From Rademacher's book (Topics in Analytic Number Theory) I'm using the functional equation of $\vartheta_2(0|\tau) = 2\sum_{m=0}^\infty q^{\left(m+\frac12\right)^2} = \vartheta_2(\tau)$ and the fact that it vanishes at the cusps $\tau = \frac{a}{b}$, $a$ odd, $b$ even.

The order of vanishing at infinity is just $\frac14$. I'd like to find the order of vanishing at the cusp $\tau = \frac12$ (no particular reason for this choice). Using say $A = \left(\begin{array}{lr} 1 & 0 \\ 2 & 1 \end{array}\right) \in \Gamma_0(2)$ and plugging into the functional equation I get $$\vartheta_2\left(\frac{\tau}{2\tau+1}\right) = i e^{-\pi i/4} \sqrt{-i(2\tau+1)}\vartheta_2(\tau)$$ As I understand it I'd want to plug $\tau = i\infty$ into this, which would give me $\vartheta_2\left(\frac12\right)$ in terms of $\vartheta_2(i\infty) = q^\frac{1}{4}+...$ However, I don't know how to handle the $\sqrt{2\tau+1}$ term if I was to put $\tau = i\infty$, so I feel like there's a big hole in my understanding.

The equation from Rademacher is given as $$\vartheta_2\left(\frac{\upsilon}{c\tau+d}\bigg|\frac{a\tau+b}{c\tau+d}\right) = i^{3-d-(a+1)/2}e^{\pi i (dc+ab-ac-1)/4}\sqrt{\frac{c\tau+d}{i}}e^{\pi i c\upsilon^2/(c\tau+d)}\vartheta_{1-c, 1-d}(\upsilon|\tau)$$ on page 182, for $c>0$, $a$ odd.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ If $f(\tau) = f(\tau+a)$ is meromorphic on $Im(\tau) > 0$ then $g(q) = f(\frac{a\log q}{2i \pi })$ is well-defined and meromorphic on $0 < |q| < 1$. So you can apply the usual tools of complex analysis : if $q=0$ is an isolated singularity of $g(q)$, you get a Taylor series for $g$ and a $q$ expansion for $f$ valid "at the cusp $i\infty$" i.e. for $Im(\tau)$ large enough. $\endgroup$
    – reuns
    Dec 23, 2016 at 3:48

1 Answer 1

6
$\begingroup$

The convention when working with modular forms $f(\tau)$ of weight $k$ is for the order of vanishing at a cusp $a/c$ to mean the order of vanishing of $(c\tau+d)^{-k} f\left(\frac{a\tau+b}{c\tau+d}\right)$ as a function of $q = e^{2 \pi i \tau}$. One also speaks of the value of a modular form at a cusp as the constant term in the $q$-expansion. This is a bit different than the usual notion of plugging in points, or examining Taylor expansions that one usually things about in complex analysis.

For example, for the regular Jacobi theta function $\theta(\tau) = \sum_{n \in \mathbb{Z}} q^{n^{2}}$, one has $\theta(-1/\tau) = (-i \tau)^{1/2} \theta(\tau)$. One says that $\theta(\tau)$ is holomorphic and non-vanshing at the cusp at zero because $\tau^{-1/2} \theta(-1/\tau)$ has an expansion in integral powers of $q$ with a nonzero constant term. However, for $r$ real and positive, we have $\theta(ir) \to \infty$ as $r \to 0$, as is fairly clear from the $q$-expansion.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ So instead I just want to consider $$(2\tau+1)^{-\frac{1}{2}}\vartheta_2\left(\frac{\tau}{2\tau+1}\right) = i e^{-\pi i/2} \vartheta_2(\tau) = i e^{-\pi i/2}(q^\frac14+...)$$ So the order of vanishing at $\tau=\frac12$ is also just $\frac14$? $\endgroup$
    – HmmmBeee
    Dec 20, 2016 at 15:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, that's correct. $\endgroup$ Dec 20, 2016 at 15:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.