10
$\begingroup$

I am reading a paper and I am trying to understand an equality which is given without proof: $$\sum_{k=1}^s\binom{2s-k}{s}\frac{k}{2s-k}v^k(v-1)^{s-k}=v\sum_{k=0}^{s-1}\binom{2s}{k}\frac{s-k}{s}(v-1)^{k} $$ Here, $s>0$, $k$ and $v$ are positive integers. The equality in question appears in Lemma 2.1 of http://web.williams.edu/Mathematics/sjmiller/public_html/ntharm15/handouts/graphs/mckay_EigenvalueLargeRandomGraphs.pdf

Would you be kind and give me some insights on how to derive this equality?

Thank you,

LH

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I added a non-automated proof below. $\endgroup$
    – GH from MO
    Dec 18, 2016 at 6:25

3 Answers 3

4
$\begingroup$

Here is a non-automated proof. We divide by $v$, and then we expand $v^{k-1}$ on the left hand side as $$v^{k-1}=(1+v-1)^{k-1}=\sum_{j=0}^{k-1}\binom{k-1}{j}(v-1)^j.$$ Then, looking at the coefficients of $v-1$ on the two sides, we are left with proving the identity $$ \sum_{\substack{0\leq k\leq s\\0\leq j\leq k-1\\j+s-k=\ell}}\binom{2s-k}{s}\frac{k}{2s-k}\binom{k-1}{j} = \binom{2s}{\ell}\frac{s-\ell}{s},\qquad 0\leq\ell\leq s-1.$$ With the notation $m:=s-k$ we have $k=s-m$, $j=\ell-m$, and the identity becomes $$ \sum_{m=0}^\ell\binom{s+m}{s}\frac{s-m}{s+m}\binom{s-m-1}{\ell-m} = \binom{2s}{\ell}\frac{s-\ell}{s},\qquad 0\leq\ell\leq s-1.$$ Equivalently, $$ \sum_{m=0}^\ell\binom{s+m-1}{s-1}\binom{s-m}{\ell-m} = \binom{2s}{\ell},\qquad 0\leq\ell\leq s-1, \tag3$$ i.e., $$ \sum_{m=0}^\ell\binom{s+m-1}{s-1}\binom{s-m}{s-\ell} = \binom{2s}{2s-\ell},\qquad 0\leq\ell\leq s-1.$$ We derive this one from the obvious identity of analytic functions $$ (1-x)^{-s}(1-x)^{\ell-s-1}=(1-x)^{\ell-2s-1},\qquad |x|<1.$$ Indeed, expanding each factor as a power series around the origin, we find that:

  • the coefficient of $x^m$ in $(1-x)^{-s}$ equals $\binom{s+m-1}{s-1}$;
  • the coefficient of $x^{\ell-m}$ in $(1-x)^{\ell-s-1}$ equals $\binom{s-m}{s-\ell}$;
  • the coefficient of $x^{\ell}$ in $(1-x)^{\ell-2s-1}$ equals $\binom{2s}{2s-\ell}$.
$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ The identity in (3) is valid due to Vandermonde-Chu's identity. $\endgroup$ Dec 18, 2016 at 16:27
  • $\begingroup$ @T.Amdeberhan: Thank you, I am not familiar with this subject. At any rate, I gave a quick proof of (3) as well. $\endgroup$
    – GH from MO
    Dec 19, 2016 at 0:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ That is the kind of elementary proof that I would like to have. Thanks $\endgroup$
    – LuHell
    Dec 19, 2016 at 16:04
13
$\begingroup$

Let's re-index the sum on the LHS of the problem (for the below convenience) so that $$\frac1s\sum_{k=0}^{s-1}\binom{s+k-1}k(s-k)v^{s-k}(v-1)^k =\frac{v}s\sum_{k=0}^{s-1}\binom{2s}k(s-k)(v-1)^k.$$ Or, just pull out the $v$ factor (leaving behind $\frac1s$, again for convenience): $$\frac1s\sum_{k=0}^{s-1}\binom{s+k-1}k(s-k)v^{s-1-k}(v-1)^k =\frac1s\sum_{k=0}^{s-1}\binom{2s}k(s-k)(v-1)^k.\tag1$$

We apply an automated technique called the Wilf-Zeilberger method for which Zeilberger wrote an algorithm, now implemented in symbolic softwares such as Maple and Mathematica.

To prove the above identity, we show both sides of (1) satisfy the same non-homogeneous recurrence $x(s+1)-v^2x(s)=\binom{2s}{s+1}\frac{(v-1)^{s+1}}s$ and just check one initial condition, say at $s=1$.

Suppressing other variables, let $F_1(s,k)=\binom{s+k-1}k\frac{s-k}sv^{s-1-k}(v-1)^k$ and $F_2(s,k)=\binom{2s}k\frac{s-k}s(v-1)^k$. The above method generates the WZ-mates \begin{align} G_1(s,k)&=F_1(s,k) \frac{v^2(s+2-k)k}{(s-k)(s+1)}, \\ G_2(s,k)&=F_2(s,k) \frac{(2s^2v+4sv+2s^2+3s-3svk-3kv+2v-2sk+vk^2)k}{(2s-k+1)(2s+2-k)(s-k)} \end{align} satisfying the relations (check using a computer) \begin{align} F_1(s+1,k)-v^2F_1(s,k)&=G_1(s,k+1)-G_1(s,k), \\ F_2(s+1,k)-v^2F_2(s,k)&=G_2(s,k+1)-G_2(s,k). \tag2 \end{align} Denote $a(s)=\sum_{k=0}^{s-1}F_1(s,k)$ and $b(s)=\sum_{k=0}^{s-1}F_2(s,k)$. Now, sum both equations in (2) over integers $0\leq k\leq s$. For instance, the first equation in (2) gives $$a(s+1)-v^2a(s)-v^2F_1(s,s)=G_1(s,s+1)-G_1(s,0).$$ But, $F_1(s,s)=0=G_1(s,0)$ and hence $a(s+1)-v^2a(s)=G_1(s,s+1)$.

Similarly, the second equation in (2) leads to $$b(s+1)-v^2b(s)-v^2F_2(s,s)=G_2(s,s+1)-G_2(s,0).$$ But, $F_2(s,s)=0=G_2(s,0)$ and hence $b(s+1)-v^2b(s)=G_2(s,s+1)$.

However, after some algebraic simplification, we obtain $$G_1(s,s+1)=G_2(s,s+1)=\binom{2s}{s+1}\frac{(v-1)^{s+1}}s.$$ Since $a(1)=b(1)$, it follows that $a(s)=b(s)$. The proof is complete.

$\endgroup$
9
  • $\begingroup$ Where does the recurrence $x(s+1)−v^2*x(s)=0$ comes from? $\endgroup$
    – LuHell
    Dec 16, 2016 at 0:33
  • $\begingroup$ This too is what Zeilberger's algorithm does spit out. $\endgroup$ Dec 16, 2016 at 0:35
  • $\begingroup$ I'm missing something. For $s=1,2,3$ the sums are $v$, $2v^2-v$, $5v^3-6v^2+2v$. Where is the recurrence $a(s+1)-v^2a(s)=0$? $\endgroup$ Dec 16, 2016 at 0:52
  • $\begingroup$ We sum $a(s)=\sum_{k=-\infty}^s$ and $b(s)=\sum_{k=0}^{2s}$ and split each into two parts (one we want and the other not what we want) and each of the 2 pairs are equal. The recurrences apply to the total sum, that is why you are getting the discrepancies. $\endgroup$ Dec 16, 2016 at 1:09
  • $\begingroup$ It seems the recurrence relation is not x(s+1)−v^2x(s)=0 $\endgroup$
    – LuHell
    Dec 16, 2016 at 19:52
7
$\begingroup$

This is not an answer but just some hints. Define $A(s)$ to be the quantity on the left and $B(s)$ to be the quantity on the right. Define $A(0)=B(0)=1$. Then it suffices to prove that $$ \sum_{s\ge0} A(s)x^s = \sum_{s\ge0} B(s)x^s = \frac{v-2-v\sqrt{1-4(v-1)x}}{2(v^2x-1)}.$$ Another way to prove it is to show that both $A(s)$ and $B(s)$ count the closed walks of length $2s$ in an infinite regular tree of degree $v$, which is the original application.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ I am very interested on how to count the closed walks and get B(s). I see you counted it to get A(s) in the proof. In fact, I am trying to derive an expression for a different regular graph model and I will need to get some similar asymptotic expression as in Lemma 3.1. I am not sure if I could prove Lemma 3.1 using A(s), so I am trying to derive B(s) in the hope to apply a similar technique to my particular graph model. How could I count those paths? $\endgroup$
    – LuHell
    Dec 16, 2016 at 17:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.