Sorry if I am being stupid. But I came to this lemma in the Appendix, written by Bourgain, Kontorovich and Magee, of the paper by Magee, Oh and Winter [MOW16]. It starts out like this:

Lemma 42 Let $\pi$ be a unitary $G$-representation on a Hilbert space $H$, and assume that the operator $A$ acts on $H$ via $$A\varphi=\sum_{j\in J}\pi(h_j)\varphi,$$ for some $h_j\in G$ and indexing set $J$. Assume that $A$ has the "spectral gap" property: there is some $C_0>0$ so that $$\langle A\varphi,\varphi\rangle\leq(1-C_0)|J|\|\varphi\|^2.$$ For sme positive coefficients $\kappa_j>0$, let $\widetilde {A}$ act on $H$ as $$\widetilde{A}\varphi=\sum_{j\in J}\kappa_j\pi(h_j)\varphi,$$ and assume that the $L^\infty$ norm of the coefficients is controlled by the $L^1$ norm, in the sense that for some $K\geq1$, $$\text{max}\kappa_j\leq K\bar{\kappa},$$ where $$\bar{\kappa}:=\frac{1}{|J|}\sum_{j}\kappa_j$$ is the coefficient average. Then $\widetilde{A}$ has the following "spectral gap": $$\langle\widetilde{A}\varphi,\varphi\rangle\leq\bar{\kappa}(1-C_0+\sqrt{K-1})|J|\|\varphi\|^2.$$

Here, the group $G$ is $\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{Z}/q\mathbb{Z})$ with an arbitrary integer $q$.

In their paper, they said it was an exercise in Cauchy-Schwarz. However, I was wondering how they did it to make the final result consist of two terms, $(1-C_0)$ and $\sqrt{K-1}$, in the bracket.

I attempted a few times applying the Cauchy-Schwarz directly to the inner product, only to find terms with $K$ instead of $\sqrt{K-1}$.

This is a duplicate of the question asked in Mathstackexchange but without any further progress.

Any comments are appreciated.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Look at $\widetilde{A} - \kappa A$ and then use Cauchy-Schwarz. $\endgroup$ – Lucia Nov 27 '16 at 1:46
  • $\begingroup$ Looks like this is more combinatorial than it appears. Suppose there are m k's larger than average and n k's smaller than average. Then |J|>=m+n and K-1 >= n/m, so the coefficient in the inequality comes out as √(n/m).(m+n). By AM-GM (a special case of C-S!) This is at least √(m/n).2√(mn)=2n, which is what you get from the trivial bound. $\endgroup$ – Fan Zheng Nov 27 '16 at 5:14
  • $\begingroup$ @FanZheng: I see no reason for $K-1\ge n/m$. If half the $\kappa$s are very slightly more than average and half are very slightly less, then $K$ can be pretty close to $1$. $\endgroup$ – Lucia Nov 27 '16 at 18:16
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry but I missed a factor $\bar\kappa-\min\kappa_i$, but fortunately it appears on both sides of the inequality, so it still works. But I guess you may have a different argument in mind because it's really a stretch to call the above argument C-S. $\endgroup$ – Fan Zheng Nov 27 '16 at 19:34

We can decompose $\langle\widetilde{A}\varphi,\varphi\rangle$ as follows.

\begin{split} \langle\widetilde{A}\varphi,\varphi\rangle&=\langle(\widetilde{A}-\bar{\kappa}A)\varphi,\varphi\rangle+\langle\bar{\kappa}A\varphi,\varphi \rangle\\ &=\langle\sum_{j\in\mathcal{J}} (k_j-\bar{\kappa})\pi(h_j)\varphi,\varphi\rangle +\bar{\kappa}\langle A\varphi,\varphi \rangle\\ &\overset{\text{(By C-S)}}\le\bigg\langle \left(\sum_{j\in\mathcal{J}}(k_j-\bar{\kappa})^2\right)^{1/2}\left(\sum_{j\in\mathcal{J}}(\pi(h_j)\varphi)^2\right)^{1/2},\varphi\bigg\rangle+\bar{\kappa}(1-C_0)|\mathcal{J}|\|\varphi\|^2. \end{split} The rest will be pure computation.

| cite | improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.