2
$\begingroup$

Write a complex finite-dimensional Lie algebra as $L=S\ltimes R$ (Levi decomposition). Then the subalgebra $[S,R]$ (generated by brackets $[s,r]$, $s\in S$, $r\in R$) is an ideal, by a simple verification based on the Jacobi and the equality $[S,R]=[S,[S,R]]$.

Is there a classical reference for this probably well-known fact ($[S,R]$ is an ideal)?

Remark: I indeed had in mind the proof given by Robin Goodfellow and I'm pretty sure I once saw it written. Moreover $[S,R]$ can be defined with no reference to any $S$: this is the intersection $R\cap\bigcap_n L^{(n)}$, where $\bigcap_n L^{(n)}$ is the intersection of the derived series (and thus the largest perfect subalgebra in $L$, which is also the ideal generated by $S$).

| cite | improve this question | | | | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ My guess would be 'Lie Algebras' by Jim Humpreys (who is also on mathoverflow, but I don't know if there is a way to 'tag' him in this comment). However I don't have the book lying around right now so I cannot check if it is really in there. $\endgroup$ – Vincent Nov 23 '16 at 13:31
  • $\begingroup$ @Vincent: Actually, I didn't get into the Levi decomposition in general in my old textbook. But Bourbaki's Chapter I in their treatise on Lie groups and Lie algebras is still a standard reference. $\endgroup$ – Jim Humphreys Nov 25 '16 at 23:22
  • $\begingroup$ @JimHumphreys Let me just quickly grab the opportunity to say that I learned a LOT from your Lie algebra book! $\endgroup$ – Vincent Nov 28 '16 at 9:07
  • $\begingroup$ Concerning references, I don't see this written down in Bourbaki, Serre, etc. But an easy corollary of Levi's theorem is found on page 91 of Jacobson's 1962 book Lie Algebras (now in Dover reprint): in your notation, $[L,L] \cap R = [L,R]$, which is therefore an ideal of $L$. It's a quick argument not using $[S,S]=S$ or the Jacobi identity. The fact that $[S,R]$ is an ideal takes a little more argument but is also an elementary consequence of Levi's theorem. (Note that Mal'cev's conjugacy theorem for Levi subalgebras isn't used.) $\endgroup$ – Jim Humphreys Nov 28 '16 at 22:56
  • $\begingroup$ @JimHumphreys That both $[L,L]\cap R$ and $[L,R]$ are ideals is immediate regardless of Levi's theorem. That $[S,R]$ is an ideal, I can hardly say that it relies on Levi's theorem since its bare definition relies on Levi's theorem. That the obvious inclusion $[L,R]\subset [L,L]\cap R$ is an equality is a consequence of the vanishing of $H_2(L/R)$ (which is equivalent to Levi' theorem for Lie algebras with central radical). $\endgroup$ – YCor Nov 29 '16 at 5:07
2
$\begingroup$

I clearly wasn't thinking the first time I did this, so please ignore the previous versions of this answer. Many thanks to YCor for pointing out the former flaws.

Of course, $[S,R]\leq R$, since $R$ is an ideal, so $[S,[S,R]]\leq[S,R]$. Going the other way, since $S$ is perfect, $[S,R]=[[S,S],R]\leq[[S,R],S]+[S,[S,R]]=[S,[S,R]]$, so $[S,R]=[S,[S,R]]$.

As for showing $[R,[S,R]]\leq[S,R]$, we simply need to use the Jacobi identity and the previous result: $$[R,[S,R]]=[R,[S,[S,R]]]\leq[[R,S],[S,R]]+[S,[R,[R,S]]]\leq[S,R].$$

| cite | improve this answer | | | | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I guess "this fact" refers to the fact $[S,R]$ is an ideal, not just the equality $[S,R]=[S,[S,R]]$. $\endgroup$ – YCor Nov 25 '16 at 1:34
  • $\begingroup$ @YCor -- Perhaps I am missing something obvious, but I do not see why that would be true. $\endgroup$ – Robin Goodfellow Nov 25 '16 at 17:40
  • $\begingroup$ In general it's just $\subset$. For instance, if $S$ is $SL_2$, $R$ is the 3-dimensional Heisenberg Lie algebra (with standard action), then $[S,R]=R$, so $[R,[S,R]]$ is the 1-dimensional center, but $[S,[R,R]]=0$. So the "Jacobi identity for subalgebras" here is a proper inclusion. $\endgroup$ – YCor Nov 25 '16 at 18:45
  • $\begingroup$ @YCor -- Indeed! In retrospect, I probably should have checked what I wrote against an example. I have redone the answer. Thank you. $\endgroup$ – Robin Goodfellow Nov 25 '16 at 21:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.