Let $k$ be a finite field, $\ell \neq \mathrm{char} k$ be prime, $X/k$ be a smooth projective geometrically integral variety of dimension $d$, and $\mathcal{A}/X$ be an Abelian scheme. Let $\eta \in H^2(X,\mathbf{Q}_\ell(1))$ be the first Chern class of $\mathcal{O}_X(1)$.

I want to prove that the hard Lefschetz morphism $\eta^{d-1}: H^1(X,V_\ell\mathcal{A}) \to H^{2d-1}(X,V_\ell\mathcal{A}(d-1))$ is an isomorphism, $V_\ell\mathcal{A}$ the rationalised Tate module of $\mathcal{A}/X$. Using the Hochschild-Serre spectral sequence $H^p(G_k,H^q(\bar{X},V_\ell\mathcal{A})) \Rightarrow H^{p+q}(X,V_\ell\mathcal{A})$, I have reduced this to $k$ the algebraic closure of a finite field.

I want to apply [Deligne, Weil II], p. 250, Théorème (6.2.13) http://www.math.harvard.edu/~gaitsgde/grad_2009/Weil-II.pdf. For this I have to check:

  1. $V_\ell\mathcal{A}$ is potentially pure (see [Deligne, Weil II], p. 248, (6.2.8): This means for $(X/S,V_\ell\mathcal{A}), f: X \to S$, $S$ the spectrum of the Henselisation of $k[T]$ in $(T)$:

a) $\mathrm{Spec} k$ is a geometric generic point of an integral scheme $A_0$ of finite type over $\mathbf{Z}[1/\ell]$. [I think we can take $A_0 = \mathrm{Spec}\mathbf{F}_p$ for $p = \mathrm{char} k$.]

b) $S$ comes from scalar extension of $k$, and Henselisation, from a smooth curve $S_0$ over $A_0$ equipped with a section.

c) $f$ comes from a proper morphism $f_0: X_0 \to S_0$. [This should follow from $X/k$ being projective.]

d) $V_\ell\mathcal{A}$ comes from a pure complex $K_0 \in D^b_c(X_0)$. [This should follow since $V_\ell\mathcal{A} = R^1\pi_*\mathbf{Q}_\ell(1)$ for $\pi: \mathcal{A}^t \to X$ the dual Abelian scheme is pure of weight $-1$ by Weil II.]

  1. $V_\ell\mathcal{A}$ and $DV_\ell\mathcal{A}[-2d]$ verify the following condition: For every $i$, the dimension of the support of the sheaf $\mathcal{H}^i$ is $\leq d-i$ (set $\mathrm{dim} \emptyset = -\infty$).

Can someone please help me proving these conditions?


Since the question is “Can someone help... “, then “Sure, Beilinson-Bernstein-Deligne can!” seems to be a legitimate answer. Let me write a few words.

The statement you give is a variant of the relative Hard Lefschetz theorem for pure perverse sheaves — Théorème 5.4.10 in Beilinson-Bernstein-Deligne's paper Faisceaux pervers (Astérisque 100, 1982, Société mathématique de France).

Conditions d) and 2 of Deligne's theorem are equivalent to the hypothesis that $V_\ell(A)[d]$ is pure and perverse, respectively.

Since $\pi\colon\mathcal A\to X$ is an abelian scheme, it is proper and smooth, hence $R^1\pi_*\mathbf Q_\ell$ is a lisse sheaf (proper and smooth base changes). By the Weil conjectures (in this case, Weil's theorem), it is pure of weight $1$. Then $V_\ell\mathcal A$ is its dual; it is lisse, and pure of weight $-1$.

If $L$ is a lisse sheaf on a smooth purely $d$-dimensional variety, then $K=L[d]$ (aka, the complex where $L$ is placed in degree $-d$) is a perverse sheaf. The condition on $\mathcal H^i K$ holds since all groups are zero, except $\mathcal H^{-d}K = L$. The condition on the dual holds as well, because $K^\vee = L^\vee[d]$ and $L^\vee$ is lisse. (See [BBD] 4.3.1 for a general description of simple perverse sheaves along these lines.)

So, to answer specifically your question, replacing $L$ by $V_\ell\mathcal A$ in the preceding paragraph checks condition 2).

(Edited, twice, to remove inaccuracies and add details)

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much for your response! Can one find also a proof of condition 2. there (is this the perversity)? $\endgroup$ – TKe Nov 20 '16 at 9:23
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes it is precisely the perversity condition, but it is “hidden” in the language of perverse t-structures - see the statement of 4.2.4 where they study “cohomological amplitude properties” of a morphism. $\endgroup$ – ACL Nov 20 '16 at 9:48
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you again! I will give you the reputation once I have checked the reference tomorrow! $\endgroup$ – TKe Nov 20 '16 at 10:56
  • $\begingroup$ I am sorry that I have to ask you again: How exactly does it follow from 4.2.4 that $\pi_!\mathbf{Q}_\ell$ is pure and perverse? $\endgroup$ – TKe Nov 21 '16 at 9:00
  • $\begingroup$ Part of my answer was nonsense. I corrected it and added details. $\endgroup$ – ACL Nov 21 '16 at 20:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.