Given a real number $x$, let $\Vert x\Vert=[x]-x$, where $[x]$ is the nearest integer to $x$.

Suppose $\lambda>1$ is a Pisot number. Let $f(x)=x^k+a_{k-1}x^{k-1}+\ldots+a_0$ be the irreducible polynomial of $\lambda$ over $\mathbb{Q}$. Let $z_1,\ldots,z_{k-1}$ be the distinct roots of $f(x)$ other than $\lambda$ (so $|z_i|<1$ for all $i$).

It is known that, for various real numbers $\alpha$, the sequence $(\Vert\alpha\lambda^n\Vert)_{n=0}^{\infty}$ is square summable. Here are two examples:

1) If $\alpha=1$ then, for sufficiently large $n$, $$ \Vert\alpha\lambda^n\Vert=z_1^n+\ldots+z_{k-1}^n. $$

2) Fix integers $c_0,\ldots,c_{k-1}$ and, for $n\geq k$, define $$ c_n=-(a_{k-1}c_{n-1}+\ldots+a_0c_{n-k}). $$ Then there are $\alpha,\beta_1,\ldots,\beta_{k-1}\in\mathbb{C}$ such that $$ c_n=\alpha\lambda^n+\beta_1z_1^n+\ldots+\beta_{k-1}z_{k-1}^n $$ Then $\Im(\alpha)\lambda^n+\Im(\beta_1z^n_1+\ldots+\beta_{k-1}z^n_{k-1})=\Im(c_n)=0$. So $\alpha$ must be real since $|z_i|<1$ and $\lambda>1$. For sufficiently large $n$, $$ \Vert\alpha\lambda^n\Vert=\beta_1z_1^n+\ldots+\beta_{k-1}z_{k-1}^n. $$

My understanding is that the original work of Pisot provides some information about what real numbers $\alpha$ will give rise to square summable sequences. But I am wondering what is known explicitly about the sequence itself. Specifically, consider some $\alpha$ such that $(\Vert\alpha\lambda^n\Vert)_{n=0}^{\infty}$ is square summable. Is the sequence always expressible using powers of $z_1,\ldots,z_{k-1}$ as in the two examples above (or perhaps powers of some other fixed "eigenvalues")? If this isn't always the case, are there conditions on $\alpha$ which will ensure this?


Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.