I am looking for references (or explainations) about the twist of modular forms of half-integral weight. I try to mimic the proof of the "integral weight case" to prove that the twist of $$ \theta(\tau)=\sum_{n\in \textbf{Z}}{q^{n^2}} \quad (\tau \in \mathcal{H}) $$ by a Dirichlet character $\chi$ of odd modulus, namely $$ \theta_{\chi}(\tau)=\sum_{n\in \textbf{Z}}{\chi(n^2)q^{n^2}} \quad (\tau \in \mathcal{H}), $$ is still a modular form. But this method highly depends on the form of the automorphic factor of the $\theta$ function.

1) Do we know if the twist of a modular form of half-integral weight (defined by the use of a four-sheeted cover of $\operatorname{Gl}_2^{+}(\textbf{Q})$) is still a modular form ?

2) If $\eta$ denotes the usual Dedekind function, is $\eta_{\chi}$ a modular form ?

Many thanks !


In general, the statement is something like the following. (The following is Proposition 3.12 from Ken Ono's book "The Web of Modularity")

Suppose that $g(z) = \sum c(n) q^{n}$ is a half-integer weight modular form for $\Gamma_{0}(4N)$ with character $\chi$. If $\psi$ is a Dirichlet character modulo $m$, then $$ \sum \psi(n) c(n) q^{n}$$ is a half-integer weight modular form for $\Gamma_{0}(4Nm^{2})$ with character $\chi \psi^{2}$.

Ono does not provide a proof of this. However, there is a proof given in Shimura's 1973 Annals paper "On modular forms of half-integral weight". The fact you are seeking is Lemma 3.6 on page 466.

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ Many thanks Jeremy! I will take a look at your references $\endgroup$ – Stabilo Nov 1 '16 at 20:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.