It is well known that there is a parallel between Galois theory and covering theory. So I wonder whether there is a deep similarity between the following two facts:
Artin-Schreier theorem. The only non-trivial finite field extensions $U \supset V$ with $U$ an algebraically closed field are $U=V(\sqrt {-1}),$ so among non-trivial finite groups only $\mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z$ may "Galois-act" on an algebraically closed field.
Corollary of Lefschetz fixed point theorem. The only non-trivial finite coverings $U \to V$ with $U$ an even-dimensional sphere are given by antipodal maps, so among non-trivial finite groups only $\mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z$ may act freely on (these particular) spaces that are the universal coverings of themselves.
Unfortunately, the statement from covering theory is very particular. Maybe, there is a simple case of the first statement where the similarity may be seen even better?