1
$\begingroup$

$\mathcal{H}$ is a $d$-dimensional complex vector space. $\mathcal{E}$ maps matrix on $\mathcal{H}^{\otimes m+k}$ to matrix on $\mathcal{H}^{\otimes m}$ through $$\mathcal{E}(X)=EXE^{+},$$ where $m,k$ are integers, $E$ is a $d^m\times d^{m+k}$ matrix and $E^+$ stands for the Hermitian conjugate of $E$

What do we know about the following mapping

$$\int_U {{U}^{+}}^{\otimes m}EU^{\otimes m+k}X{{U}^{+}}^{\otimes m+k}E^{+}U^{\otimes m} dU$$

where $U^{\otimes m+k}=U\otimes U\cdots\otimes U$, and the integral ranges over Haar measure $U$ over $\mathcal{H}$.

A particular interesting case is $m=1$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The Weingarten function may be helpful in evaluating the Haar integral. See this MO post and relevant wikipedia articles. $\endgroup$ – anecdote Oct 6 '16 at 22:18
  • $\begingroup$ is $+$ actually the "Hermitian" conjugate instead of the complex conjugate? Is $U^{\otimes m }$ randomly taken from $U(d^m)$ or it's just a $u\otimes u \otimes u \cdots u$ where $u$ is randomly taken from $U(d)$. I don't understand the measure of the integral, because $U^{\otimes m}$ and $U^{\otimes m+k}$ live in $U(d^m)$ and $U( d^{m+k} )$ with different Haar measure. Please edit to clarify especially the dimensions of those matrices and which unitary group you take the Haar measure. $\endgroup$ – anecdote Oct 6 '16 at 22:36
  • $\begingroup$ @anecdote Please see the updated one. $\endgroup$ – gondolf Oct 7 '16 at 5:58
2
$\begingroup$

This is an extended version of my comment of Weingarten functions, a brute force computation that perhaps not very insightful.

I'll call $m+ k = n$ in the following and use $\dagger$ to denote Hermitian conjugate.

Let $\{e_i\}$ to be a basis in $\mathcal{H}$ then the basis in $\mathcal{H}^{\otimes m} \times \mathcal{H}^{\otimes n}$(where $E$ lives in) is \begin{equation} e_{i_1} \otimes e_{i_2} \otimes \cdots \otimes e_{i_m} \otimes e^{\dagger}_{j_1} \otimes e^{\dagger}_{j_2} \otimes \cdots \otimes e^{\dagger}_{j_n} \end{equation} The matrix $E$ can be decomposed as follows where repeated indices are assumed to be summed over \begin{equation} E = E_{i_1 i_2 \cdots i_m , j_1 j_2 \cdots j_n} e_{i_1} \otimes e_{i_2} \otimes \cdots \otimes e_{i_m} \otimes e^{\dagger}_{j_1} \otimes e^{\dagger}_{j_2} \otimes \cdots \otimes e^{\dagger}_{j_n} \end{equation} Similarly $U_{ij}$ are the components of $U$ under $e_i \otimes e_j^\dagger$ basis, then the integral becomes \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \int_U U^{\dagger}_{\bar{i}_1 i_1} U^{\dagger}_{\bar{i}_2 i_2} \cdots U^{\dagger}_{\bar{i}_{n+m} i_{n+m} }U_{ j_1 \bar{j}_1 } U_{ j_2 \bar{j}_2 } \cdots U_{j_{n+m}\bar{j}_{n+m} } \\ E_{i_1 i_2 \cdots i_m,j_1 j_2 \cdots j_n} X_{\bar{j}_1 \bar{j}_2 \cdots \bar{j}_n \bar{i}_{m+1} \cdots \bar{i}_{m+n}} E^{\dagger}_{i_{m+1} i_{m+2} \cdots i_{m+n} ,j_{n+1} j_{n+2} \cdots j_{n+m}} dU \end{aligned} \end{equation} the free indices are $\bar{i}_1, \bar{i}_2, \cdots, \bar{i}_m$ and $\bar{j}_{n+1}, \bar{j}_{n+2}, \cdots \bar{j}_{n+m}$.

The integral of the component of unitary matrices can be represented as a series over all possible permutations $\tau, \sigma$ \begin{equation} \int_{\mathcal{U}(N)} \prod_{k=1}^{n} U^{\dagger}_{\bar{i_k} i_k} U_{j_k \bar{j}_k} dU=\sum_{\tau,\sigma\in S_n} {\rm Wg}^U(\tau^{-1}\sigma)\prod_{k=1}^n \delta_{i_k,\tau(j_k)}\delta_{\bar{i}_k,\sigma(\bar{j} _k)} \end{equation} where $\rm Wg$ is the Weingarten function.

In this summation, the indices with and without bar are contracted separated, so $E$ will contract with $E^{\dagger}$ for different permutations and $X$ will contract with itself.

To further simplify this integral, you will have to explore the properties of the Weingarten function. For example when $\sigma = \tau$, the function is $1$ and all the others will be of order $\mathcal{O}(\frac{1}{d})$. If $d$ is a large number this will give you the leading order contribution.


Even the $m = 1$ case is hard. When $n > 1$, the contractions can't be expressed as trace or matrix product. There are in general $(n+m)!$ terms and I don't know how to obtain a closed form expression.

Let me demonstrate how to compute $n = 1$(which may not be trivial to OP). In that case we have $E_{i_1 j_1} X_{\bar{j}_1 \bar{i}_2 } E^{\dagger}_{i_2 j_2}$ contracted those deltas. $n+m = 2$, so there are only two possible permutations for $\sigma $ and $\tau$. Check out the Wikipedia table, when they are the same ${\rm Wg} = \frac{1}{d}$, when they are different ${\rm Wg} = \frac{-1}{d(d^2 -1)}$. Therefore the integral is \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \frac{1}{d} \left[ E_{i_1 i_1} E^{\dagger}_{i_2 i_2 } X_{\bar{i}_1 \bar{j}_2 } + E_{i_1 i_2 }E^{\dagger}_{i_2 i_1} X_{\bar{i}_2 \bar{i}_2 } \delta_{\bar{i}_1 \bar{j}_2 } \right]\\ - \frac{1}{d(d^2 - 1 ) } \left[ E_{i_1 i_1} E^{\dagger}_{i_2 i_2 } X_{\bar{i}_2 \bar{i}_2 } \delta_{\bar{i}_1 \bar{j}_2 } + E_{i_1 i_2 }E^{\dagger}_{i_2 i_1} X_{\bar{i}_1 \bar{j}_2 } \right] \end{aligned} \end{equation}

In the matrix notation it is \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \frac{1}{d} \left[ {\rm tr}(E) {\rm tr}(E^{\dagger}) X + {\rm tr}(E E^{\dagger}) {\rm tr}( X) I \right] - \frac{1}{d(d^2 - 1 ) } \left[ {\rm tr}(E) {\rm tr}(E^{\dagger}) {\rm tr}( X) I + {\rm tr}(E E^{\dagger}) X \right] \end{aligned} \end{equation}

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! Is there explicit closed form for the case m=1? $\endgroup$ – gondolf Oct 8 '16 at 10:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.