2
$\begingroup$

Let $\Omega$ be a bounded open domain in $\mathbb{R}^{n}$ with smooth boundary.$\{X_{1},\cdots,X_{m}\}$ be smooth real vector fields on $\Omega$ Which satisfy the Hormander condition. If $\gamma$ is an absolutely continuous mapping of of an interval $[a,b]$ to $\Omega$, we say that $\gamma$ is a sub-unit mapping, if for almost all $t\in[a,b]$ on has $$ \gamma'(t)=\sum_{j=1}^{m}a_{j}(t)X_{j}(\gamma(t)) $$ with $$\sum_{j=1}^{m}|a_{j}(t)|^{2}\leq 1$$ The Carnot-Caratheodory 'distance' between two points $p,q\in M$ relative to the vector fields $\{X_{1},\cdots,X_{m}\}$ is then defined to be the infimum of those $\delta>0$ such that there is a sub-unit mapping from an interval of length $\delta$ to $\Omega$ joining $p$ and $q$.that is $$ d(x,y)=\inf\{b-a|\exists \gamma(t)~~\text{with}~~ \gamma(a)=x,\gamma(b)=y. \gamma~~\text{is a sub-unit mapping} \} $$ Due to vector fields $\{X_{1},\cdots,X_{m}\}$ satisfy the Hormander condition on $\Omega$. we always have $d(x,y)<0$. we can define the sub-unit ball as $$ B_{d}(x,r)=\{y\in\Omega| d(x,y)<r\} $$ Let $\{Y_{1},\cdots,Y_{q}\}$ be smooth real vector fields choose from $$ \{X_{1},\cdots,X_{m},\cdots[X_{j},X_{k}],\cdots,[X_{j}[X_{k},X_{l}]],\cdots\} $$ and satisfy the following condition:

(1) For every $x\in \Omega$,the vectors $\{Y_{1}(x),\cdots,Y_{q}(x)\}$ span $\mathbb{R}^n$

(2) For every pair of indices $1\leq k,l\leq q$,there are functions $c_{k,l}^{1},\cdots,c_{k,l}^{q}\in C^{\infty}(\Omega)$ such that

  1. $$ [Y_{k},Y_{l}]=\sum_{m=1}^{q}c_{k,l}^{m}(x)Y_{m} $$

  2. For $1\leq m\leq q, c_{k,l}^{m}(x)=0$ if $d_{m}>d_{k}+d_{l}$

here $d_{i}$ means the degree of $Y_{i}$ like N.S.W <Balls and metrics defined by vector fields I: Basic properties> defined . Then for $x,y\in \Omega$ let $AC(x,y;\delta)$ denotes the set of all absolutely continuous mappings $\phi:[0,1]\to \Omega$ such that for almost all $0\leq t\leq 1$. $$\phi'(x)=\sum_{j=1}^{q}a_{j}(t)Y_{j}(\phi(t)) $$ with $$ |a_{j}(t)|<\delta^{d_{j}} $$ The metric $\rho$ can be define $$ \rho(x,y)=\inf\{\delta>0|AC(x,y,\delta)\neq\varnothing\} $$ and for the metric $\rho$, we can define the sub-elliptic ball $$ B_{\rho}(x,\delta)=\{y\in\Omega|\rho(x,y)<\delta\} $$ In N.S.W <Balls and metrics defined by vector fields I: Basic properties> , we know that the sub-elliptic ball has the ball-box theorem that can estimate the volume of $B_{\rho}(x,\delta)$. but in many articles such as Feffermann and Phong's article <Subelliptic Eigenvalue problems> and Jerison and Sanchez-Calle's article <Estimates for the heat kernel for a sum of squares of vector fields> it relate the volume of $B_{d}(x,\delta)$. Now, What's the relationship between sub-unit ball $B_{d}(x,\delta)$ and sub-elliptic ball $B_{\rho}(x,\delta)$ ? Are they equivalence ? if not, Can we have some property's like ball-box theorem for $B_{d}(x,\delta)$ ? Can we compute the volume of $B_{d}(x,\delta)$ ?
On the other hand, in a old article wrote by David Jerison and Antonio Sanchez-Calle < Subelliptic, Second order differential operators>, the third part the ball $B_{L}(x,r)$ he defined in the article is sub-unit ball $B_{d}(x,r)$, then it wrote "In the Hormander-type case Nagel,Stein, and Wainger have proved that the ball $B_{L}(x,r)$ is comparable to the image under the exponential mapping of an appropriate cube $\cdots$", That confused me so much, because in N.S.W's article , it just deal with the sub-elliptic ball $B_{\rho}(x,r)$ not the sub-unit ball $B_{d}(x,r)$. Can anyone help me? Thank you very much in advance!

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

If I understand your question correctly, I think the fact that the balls you call "sub-unit" and "sub-elliptic" were proved to be comparable in Theorem 4 of Nagel, Stein, and Wainger's paper.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.