For which $n$ is the "principal congruence subgroup" $\Gamma(n)\le \mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{Z})$, the subgroup consisting of matrices congruent to the identity modulo $n$, characteristic? I.e., for which $n$ is $\Gamma(n)$ stable (as a set) under all automorphisms of $\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{Z})$?


No for $n$ odd, yes for $n$ even.

By a result of Hua and Reiner, the automorphism group of $SL_2(\mathbb{Z})$ is generated by (1) conjugation by $GL_2(\mathbb{Z})$ (the matrices with determinant $\pm 1$) and (2) the map $X \mapsto \epsilon(X) \cdot X$ where $\epsilon$ is the unique nontrivial character $SL_2(\mathbb{Z}) \to \pm 1$. The maps of the form (1) clearly preserve $\Gamma(n)$, so we just need to check the single map $X \mapsto \epsilon(X) \cdot X$.

We can describe $\epsilon$ as follows: $SL_2(\mathbb{Z})$ acts on the three points of $\mathbb{P}^1(\mathbb{F}_2)$, giving a map $SL_2(\mathbb{Z}) \to S_3$. Compose this with the sign character $S_3 \to \pm 1$.

If $n$ is odd, then $\left( \begin{smallmatrix} 1 & n \\ 0 & 1 \end{smallmatrix} \right) \equiv \left( \begin{smallmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 \end{smallmatrix} \right) \bmod 2$, so $\epsilon \left( \begin{smallmatrix} 1 & n \\ 0 & 1 \end{smallmatrix} \right) = -1$. So $\left( \begin{smallmatrix} 1 & n \\ 0 & 1 \end{smallmatrix} \right)$ is in $\Gamma(n)$ but $\epsilon \left( \begin{smallmatrix} 1 & n \\ 0 & 1 \end{smallmatrix} \right) \cdot \left( \begin{smallmatrix} 1 & n \\ 0 & 1 \end{smallmatrix} \right) = \left( \begin{smallmatrix} -1 & -n \\ 0 & -1 \end{smallmatrix} \right)$ is not.

On the other hand, if $n$ is even then $X \equiv \mathrm{Id} \bmod n$ shows that $X$ maps to $e$ in $S_3$, so $\epsilon(X)=1$ and $\epsilon(X) X = X$ for all $X \in \Gamma(n)$.

  • $\begingroup$ Hmm does this imply the same result when you look at the closure of these $\Gamma(n)$'s inside $\widehat{SL_2(\mathbb{Z})}$ and continuous automorphisms? $\endgroup$ – stupid_question_bot Sep 27 '16 at 1:52
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I think you left something out. You said "let $g\in SL_2(\widehat{\mathbb{Z}})$ be $\zeta Id$ in $SL_2(\mathbb{Z}_p)$ and 1;" Did you mean "...and 1 in $\prod_{q\ne p} SL_2(\mathbb{Z}_q)$"? $\endgroup$ – stupid_question_bot Sep 27 '16 at 3:45
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Hmm, so your $X\mapsto g^{\alpha(X)}X$ only gives an automorphism of $SL_2(\widehat{\mathbb{Z}})$ right? I don't think this induces a continuous automorphism of $\widehat{SL_2(\mathbb{Z})}$ does it? For example, if you try to replace $g$ with a preimage in $\widehat{SL_2(\mathbb{Z})}$, it won't necessarily by central, right? $\endgroup$ – stupid_question_bot Sep 27 '16 at 3:52
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ ${SL_2(\mathbb Z)}$ is virtually free so $\widehat{SL_2(\mathbb Z)}$ is virtually free and thus center-free. $\endgroup$ – Ben Wieland Sep 27 '16 at 16:37
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Sorry to resurrect this post, but isn't the outer automorphism group actually $\mathbb{Z}/2\times\mathbb{Z}/2$, generated by the $\epsilon$ you describe, and by conjugation by $[[-1,0],[0,1]]$ inside $\text{GL}_2(\mathbb{Z})$? Your answer is of course still valid, since $\Gamma(n)$ is normal inside $\text{GL}_2(\mathbb{Z})$ as well. $\endgroup$ – stupid_question_bot Jan 13 '17 at 3:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.