7
$\begingroup$

Let $\mathcal P(X)$ denote the space of all probability measure defined on a measurable space $X$. We canonically endow the former with its own measurability structure, generated by evaluation maps. Let $P \subseteq \mathcal P([0,1])$ be a measurable subset of probability measures, and let $\hat p\notin P$ be such that for every bounded measurable $f:[0,1] \to \Bbb R$ there exists $p_f\in P$ satisfying $$ \int_{[0,1]} f(x) \hat p(\mathrm dx) = \int_{[0,1]} f(x) p_f(\mathrm dx), $$ or $\hat p f = p_f f$ in a short form. Does it necessarily means that there exists a probability measure $\nu \in \mathcal P(\mathcal P([0,1]))$ such that $\nu(P) = 1$ and $\hat p = \int_P p\,\nu(\mathrm dp)$?

I think this result is quite easy to show for finite $X$ where $\mathcal P(X)$ is just a subset of $\Bbb R^n$, however I am not sure whether it still holds true in my more general case. Obviously, from $[0,1]$ it would generalize to any Borel space.

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ In case this is a standard borel space this could be seen using hahn-banach by taking a compact model. $\endgroup$
    – Uri Bader
    Commented Sep 26, 2016 at 8:58
  • $\begingroup$ @UriBader: can you be more specific, please? It is indeed a standard Borel space $\endgroup$
    – SBF
    Commented Sep 26, 2016 at 9:06
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, my previous remark is incorrect. Take P to be all non-delta mearues. $\endgroup$
    – Uri Bader
    Commented Sep 26, 2016 at 9:07
  • $\begingroup$ I should go on flight mode... I will visit here in 14hrs. $\endgroup$
    – Uri Bader
    Commented Sep 26, 2016 at 9:10
  • $\begingroup$ @UriBader: thanks, have a nice flight. Having $P$ being all non-delta measures does not provide a counterexample to the OP though (if that's what you've meant). Let's say $\hat p = \delta(0)$, then taking $f = 1_{\{0\}}$ means that $\hat p f = 1$ but $p f = 0$ for all $p\in P$. $\endgroup$
    – SBF
    Commented Sep 26, 2016 at 9:17

1 Answer 1

3
+100
$\begingroup$

The answer is no.

I understand the condition on $p_f$ as belonging to the closure $\bar{P}$ for the weak-$\star$ topologie. And one can then ask whether $[\int p d\nu(p),\nu\in \mathcal{P}(\mathcal{P}([0,1]))]$ contain this closure. Consider the following counter example $$P=[\lambda \delta_0+(1-\lambda)\delta_1:0<\lambda<1]$$ Then $\delta_0 \in \bar{P}$ but not to in the convex set.

Here we have $p_ff=\hat{p}f$ which is a stronger condition than $\inf_{p\in P}|pf-\hat{p}f|=0$. We therefore have to work a bit harder to construct the counter example.

Let $\hat{p}=\frac{1}{2}\delta_0+\frac{1}{2}1_{[0,1]}$ and choose $$P=\{q_x :x\geq \frac{1}{2}\}\cup[p\in \mathcal{P}([0,1]):p1_{\{0\}}<\frac{1}{2}]$$ with $q_x=\frac{1}{2}\delta_0+\frac{1}{2}\delta_x$ We see that if $\hat{p}=\int_P pd\nu(p)$ then $$\hat{p}1_{\{0\}}=\frac{1}{2}=\frac{1}{2}\nu(\{q_x : x\geq \frac{1}{2}\})+\int_{P-\{q\}} p1_{\{0\}}d\nu(p)$$ and therefore the support of $\nu$ is a subset of $\{q_x :x\geq \frac{1}{2}\}$ which is impossible.

We now check that $P$ satisfies the condition. Let $f$ a bounded (measurable) function.

If $f(0)=a$ and $f(t)=b$ for all $t\in E\subset [0,1]$ a set of Lebesgue measure 1. Then there exist $x\geq \frac{1}{2}$ such that $f(x)=b$ and we have $\hat{p}f=\frac{1}{2}(a+b)=q_x f$.

If $f$ is not constant on a set of Lebesgue measure 1. then there exists $\epsilon >0$ and $\tilde{p}$ with $\tilde{p}1_{\{0\}}=0$ and $$\tilde{p}f>(1+\epsilon)\int f(t)dt $$ Suppose $f(0)\geq \int f(t)dt$. Then by continuity we can find $\lambda<\frac{1}{2}$ such that $\lambda f(0)+(1-\lambda)\tilde{p}f=\hat{p}f$.

Suppose $f(0)\leq \int f(t)dt$ then we use the same argument but with $$\tilde{p}f<(1-\epsilon)\int f(t)dt $$

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ How do you deal with the measurable function that is 1 at 0 and vanishes everywhere else? $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 6, 2018 at 16:54
  • $\begingroup$ @MichaelGreinecker I think one then chooses $q_x$ for any $x$ which has the same mass as $\hat{p}$ at 0. As I understand it, that is precisely the idea: Since for such functions one would have to choose a $q_x$, there is no convex representation of $\hat{p}$ that fits all functions. Overall I think the proof is correct, even though at the end the case $f(0) = \int f(t) dt$ should perhaps be treated separately as $\tilde{p} f = \int f(t) dt$ must be chosen. $\endgroup$
    – Steve
    Commented Oct 7, 2018 at 20:49
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, not sure I understand the notation here. What is a $1_{[0,1]}$ in definition of $\hat p$, a Lebesgue measure? You also a similar notation below $1_{\{0\}}$, where I guess it means the indicator function instead. $\endgroup$
    – SBF
    Commented Oct 11, 2018 at 15:06
  • $\begingroup$ @Ilya . Yes, $1_{[0,1]}$ is just the Lebesgue measure with density the function $f(x)=1$ for all $x\in [0,1]$ $\endgroup$
    – RaphaelB4
    Commented Oct 11, 2018 at 15:27
  • $\begingroup$ I'm not familiar with equating measures to functions. Do you mean that $\hat p$ is half a Lebesgue measure on $[0,1]$ with another half-mass at $0$? $\endgroup$
    – SBF
    Commented Oct 11, 2018 at 15:30

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .