In my research in theoretical physics, I have arrived at some coefficients $a_{n,m}$ depending on two integers, $n\geq 1$ and $0\leq m\leq n$:

$$ a_{n,m}=\sum_{j=0}^{n-1} {2j \choose j+m} \left(\frac{n}{4}\right)^j s(n,j+1) $$

where $s(n,j+1)$ are Stirling numbers of the first kind. Although this expression does not make it manifest (to me), these coefficients are zero when $n+m$ is even. For physical reasons, I am convinced that when $m+n$ is odd, $a_{n,m}>0$, but I haven't been able to prove it.

I would like to find a proof that $a_{n,m}\geq 0$.

I have found various ways to rewrite these coefficients. For instance, in terms of power series involving modified Bessel functions of the first kind $I_m$:

$$ a_{n,m}= \left. \frac{d^{n-1} \,\left( (1-z)^{\frac{n-2}{2}} \, I_m\left(-\frac{n}{2} \log (1-z)\right) \right)}{d z^{n-1}} \right|_{z=0} $$

but I am not able to conclude that $a_{n,m}\geq 0$ from this expression either.

Alternatively, when $n$ is a multiple of 4, these coefficients are integers, so I was hoping that there might be a combinatorial argument for this particular case. However, I have been unable to produce it.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Have you tried using the representation at mathoverflow.net/questions/34151 for the Stirling numbers and then applying the techniques at math.upenn.edu/~wilf/AeqB.html? $\endgroup$ Sep 16, 2016 at 20:11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If we define $b_{n,m} := 4^{n-1}a_{n,m}$ then $b_{n,m}$ is always an integer, so it might be easier to find a combinatorial interpretation. For example, empirically it seems that $b_{n,n-1} = n^{n-1}$, and $b_{n,n-3}$ appears to factor into small prime factors. $\endgroup$ Sep 16, 2016 at 20:30
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I am convinced that there is no closed formula in general, unlike some special cases $(n,n−1),(n,n−3)$. Not even a finite recurrence. Perhaps the best we can say is this: $b_{n,n-2k-1}=\alpha_k\times n^{2k+1}\binom{n}{k+1}\times P_k(n)$ for some polynomial $P_k\in\mathbb{Z}[n]$ of degree $2k-1$ and for some positive $\alpha_k\in\mathbb{Q}$. More importantly, each $P_k(y)$ has positive coefficients! $\endgroup$ Sep 17, 2016 at 1:07
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ The fact that $n^m\vert b_{n,m}$ can be proved. In $a_{n,m}$ replace $x=\frac{n}4$. Notice that although $\sum_{j=0}^{n-1}$, in fact $\sum_{j=m}^{n-1}$ since $\binom{2j}{j+m}=0$ when $j<m$. Consequently, $a_{n,m}$ as a polynomial in $x$ has an obvious factor $x^m$. That means $n^m$ factors out up on retreating to $\frac{n}4$ in place of $x$. $\endgroup$ Sep 17, 2016 at 1:51
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I think the $a_{n,m}$ are Fourier coefficient of the polynomials $P_n(x)=\big( nx/2 +n/2-1\big)^{\underline n}$ (falling factorial), with respect to a certain symmetric measure on $[-1,1]$ quite concentrated at $\pm 1$. I'll make a computation to reconstruct the measure. Since the $P_n$ are odd/even according to the parity of $n$, and since they are also large at $\pm 1$, this hopefully would explain both positivity and vanishing properties for the $a_{n,m}$. $\endgroup$ Sep 17, 2016 at 16:20

1 Answer 1


The numbers $a_{n,m}$ are in fact the Fourier coefficients of the polynomial $$P_n(x)=\prod_{j=1}^{n-1} \Big( \frac{nx}{2} + \frac{n}{2}-j\Big) $$ with respect to the Chebyshev measure $d\sigma:=(1-x^2)^{-1/2}dx$ on $[-1,1]$, and its orthogonal bases of the Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind. Precisely, for $0\le m\le n$ $$a_{n,m}=\frac{1}{\pi} \int_{-1}^1 P_n(x)T_m(x)d\sigma \ .$$

Changing variable, we have a trigonometric version: $$a_{n,m}=\frac{1}{\pi}\int_0^\pi P_n(\cos \theta)\cos (m\theta)d\theta \ .$$

Note that the polynomials $P_n$ and $T_m$ are odd resp. even, according to the parity of $n-1$, respectively $m$, so the integrand $P_n(x)T_m(x)$ has the same parity of $n+m-1$. On the other hand, the Chebyshev measure is symmetric, which explains the vanishing property $a_{n,m}=0$ whenever $n+m$ is even. Moreover, for odd $n+m$ the integrand is positive and concentrated about $\pm 1$; this should hopefully yield to the desired estimate $a_{n,m}>0$. I'll try some computation and in case add details later.

To compute the integral we may also use the Chebyshev-Gauss Quadrature formula on $N$ nodes, which is exact on polynomials of degree less than $2N$. Therefore, for $2N\ge n+m$ we have $$a_{n,m}=\frac{1}{N}\sum_{k=1}^{N} P_n\Big(\cos\big( \frac{2k-1}{2N}\pi \big) \Big)\ \cos\big( m\frac{2k-1}{2N}\pi\big) \ .$$

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for your detailed discussion. Indeed, this is precisely the problem that led me to these coefficients. However, I don't understand what you mean by the claim "for $n+m$ odd the integrand is positive". The polynomials that you call $P_n(x)$ have $n-1$ real roots in $(-1,1)$, so for instance, for $T_0(x)=1$, the function $P_n(x)T_0(x)=P_n(x)$ changes sign $n-1$ times in $(-1,1)$. $\endgroup$
    – Tomeu Fiol
    Sep 17, 2016 at 20:10
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, maybe it is not very clear. The complete sentence is "for n+m odd the integrand is positive about $\pm 1$ . $P_nT_m$ of course changes sign several times in (-1,1), but it is positive and large close to $\pm 1$. $\endgroup$ Sep 17, 2016 at 21:28
  • $\begingroup$ Ok, it is clear now. Thanks also for mentioning the discrete Chebyshev transform. In the past, I also tried to prove $a_{n,m} \geq 0$ from the last formula in your answer, but I didn't manage to. $\endgroup$
    – Tomeu Fiol
    Sep 17, 2016 at 22:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.