2
$\begingroup$

Recently I have seen two definition of a generator module:

1) A generator for a category $C$ is an object $G$ such that for any two parallel morphisms $f,g:X \rightarrow Y$ with $f \neq g$, then there is a morphism $h: G \rightarrow X$ such that $fh \neq gh$. If we choose $C$ to be a module category, we get a definition of a generator module;

2)A module $X$ over an algebra $A$ is called a generator if $add(A) \subseteq add(X)$.

So are the two definitions equivalent? Thank you.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What is $add(A)$? $\endgroup$ – Qiaochu Yuan Sep 12 '16 at 4:51
  • $\begingroup$ @Qiaochu Yuan Given a module X, $add(X)$ consists of all direct summands of direct sums of finitely many copies of X. $\endgroup$ – Xiaosong Peng Sep 12 '16 at 7:10
  • $\begingroup$ I think the second condition is stronger, but I don't have a counterexample. The problem is that it may be necessary to take infinite direct sums; I have in mind something like $A = \text{End}(V)$ for $V$ an infinite-dimensional vector space and $X = V$, but I haven't checked this example. $\endgroup$ – Qiaochu Yuan Sep 12 '16 at 7:47
  • $\begingroup$ @ Qiaochu Yuan When A is a finite-dimensional k-algebra, and all modules of A is finitely generated, I find the second can induce the first. But I don't know the general case. But still thank you for your help. $\endgroup$ – Xiaosong Peng Sep 12 '16 at 8:18
5
$\begingroup$

They are equivalent.

If any object of $\textrm{add}(X)$ satisfies (1) then so does $X$, and $A$ satisfies (1), so (2) implies (1).

If $G$ satisfies (1) then let $I$ be the set of homomorphisms $\alpha:G\to A$, let $G^{(I)}$ be the direct sum of copies of $G$ indexed by $I$, and let $\beta:G^{(I)}\to A$ be the map which restricts to $\alpha$ on the copy of $G$ corresponding to $\alpha$. Then $\beta$ is surjective, or (1) is contradicted by the natural map $A\to A/\textrm{im}(\beta)$ and the zero map.

Taking a splitting map $\gamma:A\to G^{(I)}$ of $\beta$, the image of $\gamma$ is contained in $G^{(J)}$ for some finite $J\subseteq I$, and so $A$ is a direct summand of $G^{(J)}$ and is therefore in $\textrm{add}(G)$. So (1) implies (2).

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ @ Jeremy Rickard Since A can be seen as a projective A-module, so we can take a splitting map $\gamma : A \rightarrow G^{(I)}$, but if the index set I is infinite, why the image of $\gamma$ is contained in $G^{(J)}$ for some finite J? $\endgroup$ – Xiaosong Peng Sep 12 '16 at 9:49
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Penson $\gamma(A)$ is the submodule of $G^{(I)}$ generated by $\gamma(1)$, and $\gamma(1)\in G^{(J)}$ for some finite $J$. (The important point is that $A$ is finitely generated as an $A$-module: if a finitely generated module is contained in a direct sum then it is contained in a finite subsum.) $\endgroup$ – Jeremy Rickard Sep 12 '16 at 9:54
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Get it! Thank you very much for your help. $\endgroup$ – Xiaosong Peng Sep 12 '16 at 9:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.