0
$\begingroup$

Is it true that $$\prod_{p\le x}\frac p{p-1}\le e^\gamma\ln x\left(1-\frac{0{.}011}{\ln x}+\frac{0.2}{(\ln x)^2}\right)$$ for all $x>25\,000$, where the product is over prime $p$?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ where is the question? $\endgroup$ – kodlu Sep 6 '16 at 8:26
  • $\begingroup$ is the inequality holds for all integers bigger than 25000 $\endgroup$ – Ahmad Sep 6 '16 at 8:44
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I took the liberty to reformat the post so that it reads like an actual question, in English. I hope I got the meaning correctly. $\endgroup$ – Emil Jeřábek Sep 6 '16 at 9:08
9
$\begingroup$

Your inequality fails for every $x\geq e^{700/11}\approx 4.33433\times 10^{27}$.

Indeed, by Theorem 8 in the classic paper Rosser-Schoenfeld: Approximate formulas for some functions of prime numbers, we have $$e^\gamma\ln x\left(1-\frac{0.5}{(\ln x)^2}\right)<\ \prod_{p\le x}\frac p{p-1},\qquad x>1,$$ hence your inequality can only hold when $$1-\frac{0.5}{(\ln x)^2}< 1-\frac{0{.}011}{\ln x}+\frac{0.2}{(\ln x)^2},$$ i.e., when $$\ln x< 0.7/0.011=700/11.$$

Added. In fact Diamond and Pintz showed (Journal de Théorie des Nombres de Bordeaux 21 (2009), 523-533) that the product in question exceeds $e^\gamma\ln x$ for infinitely many integers $x$ (actually they prove much more than this).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.