Preface The purpose of my question - on high level - is to understand exceptional symmetric spaces. My latest idea is to embed them into Lie group. There is quite nice embedding of 32-dimensional $E_{III}$ and 40-dimensional $E_{II}$ in $E_6$. It would be nice to see similar embedding for $E_I$ and $E_{IV}$.

Another thing which strikes me is that symmetric spaces $E_I$, $E_{II}$, $E_{III}$, $E_{IV}$ correspond to 2-dimensional projective space over $\mathbb C \otimes \mathbb O$. Can we analyze 1-dimensional space over this algebra ? In such case we obtain symmetric spaces $G_{5,5}^+\times S^1$, $G_{4,6}^+$, $G_{2,8}^+$, $S^9\times S^1$. These conlusion I present without proof. The dimensions of last symmetric spaces are lower by 16 than the first ones. Can we see the same analogy when considering symmetric spaces corresponding to $\mathbb C \subset \mathbb H$ ? I am asking, because on this wikipedia page symmetric space $E_{II}$ is presented as "space of symmetric subspaces isometric to $\mathbb C\otimes \mathbb HP^2$" (which is $G_{2,4}\mathbb C$ according to me).

As a last statement in my preface I would like to add that I am not interested in abstract definitions. I look at Lie groups as matrix groups preferably. I also accept Lie group as group acting on some geometrical object called "Rosenfeld projective plane". (It seems this term is not accepted by all mathematical community). Therefore I would preferably see embedding of symmetric space in Lie group $E_6$ in this language.

Formulating the questions

Question 1 Is it possible to embed symmetric spaces 42-dimensional $E_I$ and 26-dimensional $E_{IV}$ into compact Lie group $E_6$ ? Please provide construction of such embedding.

As it was answered in this Conjugacy classes of involutions in compact simple Lie group question, $E_{II}$ and $E_{III}$ can be embedded in $E_6$ as components if $\{x^2=1\}$ set.

Next I would like to continue in $Spin_{10}\times Spin_2$ group considered as automorphism of $\mathbb C\otimes \mathbb OP^1$. The plan is to find nice embeddding of $E_{IV}$ in $E_6$ first. Define nine letters in Clifford algebra $C_9$. Let $e_k$=$$\begin{pmatrix} L_k & \\ & R_k \end{pmatrix} $$ where $L_k$ and $R_k$ are left and right multiplications by imaginary base octonions, k=1..7. Let $e_8$=$$\begin{pmatrix} & S \\ -S & \end{pmatrix} $$ and $ e_9$=$$\begin{pmatrix} & iS \\ iS & \end{pmatrix} $$. $S$ is octonion conjugation. Let $V_{10}$=$<1,e_1,...,e_9>$ and $S^9$ be unit sphere in $V_{10}$.

Let $E_{III}^1$ = $\{iv\bar w: v\perp w \in S^9 \}$. It can be treated as $P^1$ (shortcut for $\mathbb C \otimes \mathbb OP^1$). Note that elements of this set does not depend on selection of $v,w$ from given plane of $V_{10}$. So $P^1$=$G_{2,8}^+$ topologically. In this definition $i$=$e_1...e_9$ is center of Clifford algebra $C_9$. Products of perpendicular elements from $P^1$ is set $E_{II}^1$=$E_{II}\cap P^1$=$\{v\bar wx\bar y: v\perp w\perp x \perp y \in S^9 \}$=$G_{4,6}^+$. The dimension of $E_*^1$ is 16 less then dimension of $E_*$ where *=I,II,III,IV.

The candidate for $E_I^1$ is $G_{5,5}^+\times S^1$, $E_{IV}^1$=$S^9\times S^1$. To start the prove let's ask question.

Question 2: Can $S^9$ be treated as embedding of $Spin_{10}/Spin_9$ into $Spin_{10}$ ?

To analyze dimension problem let's ask following question.

Question 3: Is dimension of $\{\mathbb CP^1\subset\mathbb HP^1\}$ four dimensions lower than $\{\mathbb CP^2\subset\mathbb HP^2\}$ ?

The first space seems to be 6-dimensional $G_{2,3}$. I don't know dimension of second space (please help), but it should be 10-dimensional $:)$

EDIT: Thank you for re-opening my question. Using first comment from Robert Bryant I will answer my first question. The Cartan's embedding uses outer involution. However I would like to find out more about the geometry before I post the answer. It will add more flavor to the answer. I might post similar questions for $E_7$ and $E_8$. Again I need to understand more the geometry.

EDIT October 2016 I paste following pictures illustrating at least how dimensions of exceptional symmetric spaces and corresponding maximal subgroups can be calculated. I hope there is more in the pictures. I leave the reader to figure out what they contain. First picture show compact $E_6$ and $E_{II}$

Compact $E_6$ and $E_{II}$

and remaining $E_{IV}$, $E_I$, $E_{III}$.

enter image description here

  • 5
    $\begingroup$ I'm not sure what you are asking. Cartan showed that every (irreducible) symmetric space can be isometrically embedded (up to a constant factor) into its group of symmetries. Moreover, this embedding is canonical: Let $\sigma:G\to G$ be the involution whose fixed subgroup is $K\subset G$, then the symmetric space $G/K$ has an embedding $\iota:G/K\to G$ given by $\iota(gK) = g\sigma(g)^{-1}$. This $\iota$ is equivariant with respect to the left $G$-action and isometric when $G$ is given its bi-invariant metric (with the appropriate constant scale factor). $\endgroup$ – Robert Bryant Sep 5 '16 at 17:13
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I have asked, because on my previous question Mikhail Borovoi commented that EI and EIV cannot be embedded into $E_6$ as G-subvarieties. So posted this question to see the answer. I have not finished my question, because I planned to add some proposal, how EI and EIV could be embedded into $E_6$. I would like to see it in whole "magic square" picture. It is nice to hear that Cartan already embedded symmetric spaces into its group of symmetric. In such case I would like to see some nice embeddings as there are such for EII and EIII. $\endgroup$ – Marek Mitros Sep 5 '16 at 18:50
  • $\begingroup$ @RobertBryant: I don't think that your embedding $\iota$ is equivariant with respect to the left $G$-action. $\endgroup$ – Mikhail Borovoi Sep 5 '16 at 19:57
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @MikhailBorovoi: What do you mean, 'not equivariant'? The embedding $\iota$ satisfies $$\iota\bigl(h(gK)\bigr) = h\,\iota(gK)\,\sigma(h)^{-1}$$ for all $h,g\in G$, so it intertwines the left action of $G$ on $G/K$ with the $\sigma$-twisted conjugate action of $G$ on itself in the range. Meanwhile, the $\sigma$-twisted conjugate action is clearly isometric with respect to the bi-invariant metric on $G$, so the embedding $\iota$ is certainly isometric (up to a constant scale factor, which can be taken to be $1$). $\endgroup$ – Robert Bryant Sep 6 '16 at 1:41
  • $\begingroup$ @RobertBryant: Going back to Cartan. Can we find $\sigma$ which fix subgroup $Sp_4$ or $F_4$ of $E_6$ ? $\endgroup$ – Marek Mitros Sep 6 '16 at 8:31

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.