3
$\begingroup$

I have the following integral $$g(x_0) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{1}{(1+x^2)^{3/4}}\frac{1}{(1+(x+x_0)^2)^{3/4}}\exp\left(-\frac{2\pi i}{\lambda}\left[\sqrt{1+x^2}-\sqrt{1+(x+x_0)^2} \right] \right)\mathrm{d}x$$

This can be re-written as $$g(x_0) =\int f(x)f^\ast(x+x_0)\mathrm{d}x$$ where $$f(x)=\frac{1}{(1+x^2)^{3/4}}\exp\left(-\frac{2\pi i}{\lambda}\sqrt{1+x^2} \right).$$

Thus, $G(\omega) = |F(\omega)|^2.$

Now, I observe from numerical integration that $g(x_0)$ is very, very, close to $$g(x_0) \approx 2\mathrm{sinc}\left( \frac{2x_0}{\lambda}\right).$$

I would like to understand why. In particular, $F(\omega)$ has a very steep decay (basically brickwall shape - resembling the sinc) around $\omega = \lambda/4$.

If the question, "why is the approximation so good?" too fuzzy, then the reason behind the super-steep decay of $F(\omega)$ can be answered.

Cheers

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Are you missing a factor? Setting $x_0 = 0$ the integral simplifies to $\int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{1}{(1 + x^2)^{3/2}} = 2 \neq \mathrm{sinc}(0)$. $\endgroup$ Aug 24, 2016 at 17:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Taking $x_0=1$ and $\lambda=1$ and $5$ I also get disagreement, and not just by a constant factor. Probably Karen copied something wrong. Should we put the question on hold until Karen can correct it? $\endgroup$ Aug 24, 2016 at 18:01

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.