3
$\begingroup$

I think that the following inequality holds for all $x > 0$ and all $\nu \ge \frac{1}{2}$:

$$ K_\nu(2 x) \le \frac{2^{2 - 2 \nu}}{\Gamma(\nu)} x^\nu K_\nu^2(x) ,$$ where $K$ is a modified Bessel function of the second kind.

Here's a plot of $\frac{2^{2 - 2 \nu}}{\Gamma(\nu)} x^\nu K_\nu^2(x) - K_\nu(2 x)$ for different $\nu$s:

x for each nu

And the minimum of these curves over 10,000 points $0 < x \le 10$ while varying $\nu$ (which is of course just the curve's value at 10):

minima over x for each nu

I've proved the relationship when $\nu$ is a half-integer on math.stackexchange; I'd like to show it for all other $\nu \ge \tfrac12$. So showing that the derivative in $\nu$ is always positive would be sufficient, but that derivative is gross: Letting $L_\nu(x) := \frac{\partial}{\partial \nu} K_\nu(x)$ and $\psi$ be the digamma function, the derivative is

$$ 4 x^{\nu } K_{\nu }(x) \left(K_{\nu }(x) \left(\psi(\nu )+\log \left(\frac{4}{x}\right)\right)-2 L_\nu(x)\right)+4^{\nu } \Gamma (\nu ) L_\nu(2 x) .$$

Neither I nor Mathematica can prove that it's positive – though it seems numerically like it is. Is there some duplication relation for $L_\nu$ or other property that will help prove this? Or a completely different approach?

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

The proposer’s inequality can be improved by a factor of two, that is,

$ (I) \quad K_\nu(2x) \le \, \dfrac{2^{1-2\nu}}{\Gamma(\nu)} \,x^\nu K_\nu^{\,2}(x) \,\, ,x>0, \nu\ge 1/2 .$

Two integral identities and one inequality is needed: $ (a) \quad K_\nu^{\,2}(x) =\frac{1}{2}\int_{0}^\infty\dfrac{dt}{t} e^{\large-t/2-x^2/t} K_\nu(x^2/t)$

$ (b) \quad K_\nu(2x) =\frac{1}{2}x^\nu\int_{0}^\infty\dfrac{dt}{t^{\nu+1}} e^{\large-t-x^2/t}$

$ (c) \quad x^\nu K_\nu(x)>2^{\nu-1} \Gamma(\nu)\, e^{\large-x}$

The references are (a) DLMF 10.32.18 with x=y; (b) DLMF 10.32.10 with 2x as the argument; (c) J. Math. Anal. Appl. 420 (2014) 373-386. It should be noted that the author of (c) claims that the region of validity is for x>0, $\nu > 0,$ but it appears that the proper region is for $\nu\ge 1/2 .$ (The derivation uses a formula that is good only for $\nu\ge 1/2,$ and plots indicate that the inequality breaks down for $\nu\lt 1/2$. Besides, the problem requires only $\nu\ge 1/2$.) All formulas are valid for $x>0.$

In $(I)$, use $(a)$ on the RHS (right-hand side). Use $(c)$ within the resulting integral to get

$ \dfrac{2^{1-2\nu}}{\Gamma(\nu)} \,x^\nu K_\nu^{\,2}(x) \ge \dfrac{(2x)^\nu}{2}\int_{0}^\infty\dfrac{dt}{t^{\nu+1}} e^{\large-t/2-2x^2/t} \Bigl(\dfrac{t}{2x}\Bigr)^{2\nu} \,.$

Now the RHS of the previous equation is, by (b), $K_{-\nu}(2x)=K_{\nu}(2x),$ where the well-known index reflection formula has been used. $\square$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you! It took me a while to reproduce your steps because of a dumb mistake, but this seems to be correct, and I'll be citing you in my thesis soon. :) [Let me know if you'd prefer to be cited under some other name...] $\endgroup$ – Dougal Aug 29 '16 at 3:21
  • $\begingroup$ In terms of the flawed claim of (c): it seems that (c) was shown for $\nu > \tfrac12$ in (1.4) of Ismail, Complete Monotonicity of Modified Bessel Functions (doi). It is also trivially true for $K_{1/2}(x) = \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2 x}} e^{-x}$, since $\sqrt{x} \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2 x}} e^{-x} = \sqrt{\pi / 2} e^{-x}$ is identically more than $1/\sqrt{2} \Gamma(2) e^{-x} = \frac1{\sqrt 2} e^{-x}$. So I'll just cite it from there. $\endgroup$ – Dougal Aug 29 '16 at 3:33

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.