2
$\begingroup$

Let $f:M\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$ be a smooth function, where $M$ is a closed manifold. I have the feeling that the Lusternik-Schnirelmann category of $M$ is an estimate from below of the number of components of the critical points set of $f$, rather than only the number of critical points of $f$, which is, of course, a stronger result. Am I wrong? Any references are welcome.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

Doesn't the height function on a torus laying down on its side give a counter-exsmple? There are two circles of critical points, but $\mathrm{cat}(T^2) =3$.

Added: A constant function on a connected non-contractible manifold gives an even easier example.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for the answer, I see that this is not the right question. Anyway, I have in mind some examples, when the function has some number of components of the critical set and it seems stable by perturbations. So, I wondered what invariant would be responsible for that. $\endgroup$
    – user94090
    Aug 20, 2016 at 20:06
  • $\begingroup$ You might be interested in Morse-Bott homology. As well as the original paper of Bott on periodicity, this is discussed in an article of Austin and Braam. I can dig out the precise references later if you like. $\endgroup$
    – Mark Grant
    Aug 21, 2016 at 5:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.