1
$\begingroup$

Suppose that for two discrete random variables $X_1$ and $X_2$, we know their conditional distributions. Namely $$X_1~|~X_2 = x_2 \sim \mathrm{Poisson}(\lambda_1 + ax_2),$$ $$X_2~|~X_1 = x_1 \sim \mathrm{Poisson}(\lambda_2 + bx_1).$$

We want to calculate their joint distribution, $p(X_1, X_2)$.

My own idea is to divide the equations above and find $\frac{p_{X_1}(x_1)}{p_{X_2}(x_2)}$ and then sum over all values of $X_1$ to find $1/p_{X_2}(x_2)$. But for this, I have to compute a very bad series.

Do you have any idea for this problem?

P.S. The series I have to compute is of form $$\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{c^n}{n!(a+nb)^k},$$ which I hardly believe to have a closed form.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ It is even worse than that: $P(x=u)/P(x=v)$ obviously factors into a function of $u$ and a function of $v$ while I absolutely do not understand how you are going to factor $(c+av)^u/(d+bu)^v$ that way unless $a=b=0$, in which case everything is trivial. So, it looks like your system is inconsistent more often than not... $\endgroup$ – fedja Aug 15 '16 at 19:23
3
$\begingroup$

Unless I've made a mistake, this doesn't seem to be possible.

One thing you can do is look at the joint MGF. Conditioning on $X_1$,

$$ \eqalign{M(s,t) &= \mathbb E\left[ \exp(s X_1 + t X_2) \right] = \mathbb E \left[ \exp(s X_1) \mathbb E[\exp(t X_2) | X_1] \right] \cr &= \mathbb E \left[ \exp(s X_1) \exp((\lambda_2 + b X_1)(e^t-1))\right]\cr &= \exp(-\lambda_2 (e^t-1)) M(s+ b (e^t-1),0)}$$

Similarly, conditioning on $X_2$,

$$M(s,t) =\exp(-\lambda_1 (e^s-1)) M(0, t + a (e^s-1)) $$

Combining these and replacing $s$ by $s - b (e^t-1)$:

$$ M(s,0) = \exp(\lambda_1 (1 - e^{s + b (1-e^t)})) + \lambda_2(e^t-1)) M(0, a\exp(s + b(1-e^t))-a+t)$$

and similarly

$$ M(0,t) = \exp(\lambda_2 (1 - e^{t + a (1-e^s)})) + \lambda_1 (e^s-1)) M(b\exp(t + a(1-e^s))-b+s, 0) $$

But replacing $t$ by $a\exp(s + b(1-e^t))-a+t$ here gives us a rather complicated functional equation for $M(s,0)$:

$$ M \left( s,0 \right) =M \left( b{{\rm e}^{a{{\rm e}^{-b{{\rm e}^{t}}+b +s}}-a{{\rm e}^{s}}+t}}-b+s,0 \right) {{\rm e}^{-\lambda_{{2}}{{\rm e} ^{a{{\rm e}^{-b{{\rm e}^{t}}+b+s}}-a{{\rm e}^{s}}+t}}-\lambda_{{1}}{ {\rm e}^{-b{{\rm e}^{t}}+b+s}}+\lambda_{{2}}{{\rm e}^{t}}+{{\rm e}^{s} }\lambda_{{1}}}} $$ Now taking the derivative with respect to $t$ and evaluating at $t=0$ gives us a differential equation for $M(s,0)$:

$$\dfrac{\partial M}{\partial s}(s,0) = -{\frac {M \left( s,0 \right) \left( -\lambda_{{2}} \left( -ab{ {\rm e}^{s}}+1 \right) +\lambda_{{1}}{{\rm e}^{s}}b+\lambda_{{2}} \right) }{b \left( -ab{{\rm e}^{s}}+1 \right) }} $$ which we can solve (with initial condition $M(0,0)=1$): $$M(s,0) = \left( \dfrac{abe^s-1}{ab -1} \right)^{\frac{\lambda_2}{b} + \frac{\lambda_1}{ab}} $$ Unfortunately, this does not satisfy the functional equation. So it seems there is no solution in general.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.