0
$\begingroup$

In a set of notes, I came across the following few lines involving the covariant derivative, and just wanted to make sure I understood the notation correctly:

Let $\lbrace F_{1},F_{2},F_{3},F_{4}\rbrace$ be a null tetrad. Then from Newman Penrose formalism we have an equation

$\nabla_{F_{4}}F_{3}=(\alpha-\overline{\beta})F_{3}+\overline{\mu}F_{1}-\rho F_{2}$

Then we have

$F_{4}\hskip .5pt ^{l}\nabla_{l}F_{3}\hskip .5pt^{k}=(\alpha-\overline{\beta})F_{3}\hskip .5pt ^{k}+\overline{\mu}F_{1}\hskip .5pt ^{k}-\rho F_{2}\hskip .5pt ^{k}$

So, do I understand correctly that in the second equation, we simply take the components of the original Newman Penrose equation?

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ It looks to me more like abstract index notation than taking components. $\endgroup$ Aug 11, 2016 at 13:27
  • $\begingroup$ @WillieWong could you please elaborate a little bit? $\endgroup$
    – GregVoit
    Aug 11, 2016 at 16:50
  • $\begingroup$ See Sec 2.4 in Wald's book on GR. $\endgroup$ Aug 11, 2016 at 19:57

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

$$F_4 = F_4^l \frac{\partial}{\partial x^l}$$ $$\nabla_{F_4}F_3 = \nabla_{\left(F_4^l \frac{\partial}{\partial x^l}\right)}F_3 = F_4^l \nabla_{\frac{\partial}{\partial x^l}}F_3 = F_4^l \nabla_lF_3 = F_4^l \Big(\nabla_lF_3\Big)^k\frac{\partial}{\partial x^k}$$ $$ F_4^l \Big(\nabla_lF_3\Big)^k\frac{\partial}{\partial x^k} = F_4^l \nabla_l F_3^{\,k}\frac{\partial}{\partial x^k} = \Big((\alpha - \bar{\beta}) F_3^k + \bar{\mu}F_1^k - \rho F_2^k\Big) \frac{\partial}{\partial x^k}$$

Basically, they have omitted the parenthesis that specify that they have taken the $k$-th component of the covariant derivative of the vector field $F_3$ in the $l$-th coordinate direction.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ so are you saying that in this notation, $\nabla_{l}(v^{k})=\left(\nabla_{l}v\right)^{k}$? @Futurologist $\endgroup$
    – GregVoit
    Aug 12, 2016 at 5:04
  • $\begingroup$ No, I think such index "commutativity" does not hold in general. I simply mean that the notation is, as you said it yourself, taking the $k$-th component of the covariant derivative $(\nabla_{F_4}F_3)^k = (F_4^l \nabla_l F_3)^k = F_4^l (\nabla_l F_3)^k$ is written as $F_4^l \nabla_l F_3^{\, k}$. Simply the parentheses are omitted. In general $$(\nabla_l v)^k \partial_k = \nabla_l ( v^k ) \partial_k + v^j \Gamma_{ l j }^k \partial_k$$ $\endgroup$ Aug 12, 2016 at 5:40

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.