Geometric interpretation of horizontal and vertical lift of vector field In many References such as D.E. Blair, Riemannian Geometry of Contact and Symplectic Manifolds chapter 9, and Differential Geometric Structures
By Walter A. Poor Page 54; the horizontal and vertical lift(space) of a vector field on $M$, $X\in\Gamma(TM)$, are defined as follows:

If $X$ is a vector field on $M$, its vertical lift $X^V$ on $TM$ is the vector
  field defined by $X^V\omega = \omega(X)\circ \pi$, where $\omega$ is a 1-form on $M$, which on the left side of this equation is regarded as a function on $TM$.
  For an affine connection $\nabla$ on $M$, the horizontal lift $X^H$ of $X$ is defined
  by $X^H\omega = \nabla_X\omega$.
The span of the horizontal lifts at $t ∈ TM$ is called the horizontal subspace of $T_tTM$.

The other approach is as follows:

It is well-known that the tangent space to $TM$ at $(x, u)$ splits into the direct
  sum of the vertical subspace  $VTM_{(x,u)}=ker\pi_*|_{(x,u)}$ and the horizontal subspace  $HTM_{(x,u)}$ with respect  to $\nabla$
  $$TTM=HTM\oplus VTM.$$
  For $X\in T_xM$, there exists a unique vector $X^h$ at the point $(x, u)\in TM$
  such that $X^h\in HTM_{(x,u)}$ and $\pi_*(H^h) = X$. $X^h$ is called the horizontal  lift
  of $X$ to $(x, u)$. There is also a unique vector $X^v$ at the point $(x, u)$ such that
  $X^v\in VTM_{(x,u)}$ and $X.(df) = Xf$ for all functions  $f$ on $M$. $X^v$ is called the vertical   lift
  of $X$ to $(x, u)$.

My problems are:


*

*How can I split every vector field in $TTM$ into horizontal and vertical part?

*What is the geometric interpretation of horizontal and vertical spaces?

*why the tangent sphere bundle and tangent bundle is different in the sense of horizontal and vertical part?


It seems that after solving the question I can to prove the following identities:
$$[X^v,Y^v]=0,\quad dX(Y)=Y^h+(\nabla_YX)^v\quad X,Y\in\Gamma(TM).$$
Thanks.
 A: I find the following viewpoint helpful to translate between the different incarnation of a connection.
To every vector bundle $\pi: E \to M$ (in your case $E = TM$) we have an associated exact sequence of vector bundles (sometimes called the Atiyah sequence, at least in the principal bundle case):
$$ 0 \to V E \to TE \to \pi^* TM \to 0 $$
Here $VE$ denotes the bundle of vertical tangent bundles. Now there are three ways to split an exact sequence:


*

*Write down an isomorphism between the middle term and the sum of the terms on the right- and left-hand side. In our case, this corresponds to the decomposition $TE = VE \oplus HE$.

*Split on the left, i.e. give a map $TE \to VE$. This is the connection form $\omega$.

*Split on the right, i.e. specify a map $\pi^* TM \to TE$. This corresponds to lifting a tangent vector from $M$ to $E$.


So now it should be pretty clear how to translate between the different viewpoints (modulo some natural isomorphisms). For example, every tangent vector $X \in T_e E$ can be written as a sum $X^v + X^h$, where $X^v = \omega(X)$ and $X^h$ is the horizontal lift of some vector $Y \in T_{\pi(e)}M$.
