Let us consider a category $C$ formed by topological spaces and continuous functions (or by smooth manifolds and smooth functions). We consider the morphism category $C_{2}$. An object of $C_{2}$ is a morphism $\rho \colon A \to X$ in $C$. A morphism between $\rho \colon A \to X$ and $\eta \colon B \to Y$ is a pair of continuous functions $(f \colon X \to Y, g \colon A \to B)$ such that $f \circ \rho = \eta \circ g$.

Moreover, given two morphisms $(f_{0}, g_{0}), (f_{1}, g_{1}) \colon \rho \to \eta$, a homotopy between them is defined in the following way. Let us consider the object $\rho_{I} := \rho \times id_{I} \colon A \times I \to X \times I$. A morphism $(F, G) \colon \rho_{I} \to \eta$ is a homotopy between $(f_{0}, g_{0})$ and $(f_{1}, g_{1})$ if $F\vert_{X \times \{i\}} = f_{i}$ and $G\vert_{A \times \{i\}} = g_{i}$ for $i = 0, 1$. Finally, a homotopy equivalence between $\rho \colon A \to X$ and $\eta \colon B \to Y$ is a morphism $(f, g) \colon \rho \to \eta$ such that there exists $(f', g') \colon \eta \to \rho$ verifying $(f', g') \circ (f, g) \simeq id_{\rho}$ and $(f, g) \circ (f', g') \simeq id_{\eta}$.

My question is the following. Let us consider the category $M$ of smooth manifolds and the category $CW$ of spaces having the same homotopy type of a countable finite-dimensional CW-complex. It is known that, given an object $X$ of $CW$, there exist an object $\hat{X}$ of $M$ and a homotopy equivalence $\xi \colon X \to \hat{X}$ (a proof is shown in Kreck, Singhof, "Homology and cohomology theories on manifolds", section 2, fact 2). Does the same result hold about the categories $M_{2}$ and $CW_{2}$? Explicitly, given a continuous function $\rho \colon A \to X$ between objects of $CW$, can we find a smooth function $\hat{\rho} \colon \hat{A} \to \hat{X}$ between manifolds and a homotopy equivalence $(f, g) \colon \rho \to \hat{\rho}$ in $CW_{2}$?

  • $\begingroup$ That's interesting, but when you take a homotoy pull-back the diagram commutes up to homotopy, thus it is not a morphism in CW2. I don't see how to reach a morphism. $\endgroup$ – Fabio Jul 16 '16 at 20:52
  • $\begingroup$ Oh sorry I was thinking to something else... I have removed the comment $\endgroup$ – Simon Henry Jul 17 '16 at 13:09
  • $\begingroup$ Does there (for a given object $\rho$) always exist a morphism $\rho\to\hat{\rho}$ to a "smooth object" $\hat{\rho}$ such that $A\to\hat{A}$ and $X\to\hat{X}$ are homotopy equivalences? Same question for the other direction? $\endgroup$ – user83633 Jul 18 '16 at 7:16

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.