2
$\begingroup$

If this is too basic for MathOverflow... say the word and I shall move it to Math.SE

First consider this system of ODEs. Say I have two variables $u$ and $a$, following

$$ \dot u = -u + f(a) $$

$$ \tau \dot a = -a + gu $$

Where $f$ is nonlinear. If $\tau\ll1$, the timescale of $a$ is fast, and $a$ can be approximated by its steady-state value $gu$, giving a simpler reduced system.

$$ \dot u = -u + f(gu) $$

Now, what happens if the equation for $a$ has additive Gaussian noise? Here $\xi$ denotes the time derivative of a unit-variance Wiener process:

$$ \dot a = [gu-a]/\tau + \sigma \xi $$

If $u$ can be assumed constant relative to the timescales of $a$, this can be approximated as an Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process, and has the steady-state distribution

$$ a \sim \mathcal{N}(gu,\tau\sigma^2/2) $$

I don't have training in stochastic calculus, so I'm wondering how (if it is possible), one might "plug in" this expression for the steady-state distribution of $a$ into the equation for $u$? Since $f$ is nonlinear, we can't simply turn this in to additive or multiplicative noise, and it doesn't seem like Itô's lemma is applicable either.

I think this question is equivalent to asking if there is a good way to treat and reason about the continuous time analogue of this stochastic difference equation:

$$ {\Delta u} = -u + f(gu + \mathcal{N}(0,\tau\sigma^2/2)) $$

If it matters, I'm particularly interested in the case where the nonlinearity $f$ is the logistic function $f(x) = 1/(1+\exp(-x))$. Approximations are OK, but I would prefer that $u$ be confined to the range of the logistic function $u\in [0,1]$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.