Infinite dimensional version of a simple fact on certain singular matrices We consider the following simple fact about matrices. Then we try to generalize it in the context of smooth manifolds;
Let $L$ be the collection of all $n \times n$ real matrices $A=(a_{ij})$ with the following property:
$$\sum_{i=1}^{n} a_{ij}=0$$ for every fixed $j$.
Obviousely $L$ is a Lie algebra.(As I have already learned from Qiaochu Yuan in another MO post)
Moreover the linear map $X \mapsto AX$ has non trivial kernel.
These simple facts can be modelized in an infinite dimensional manner.(note that a vector $X\in\mathbb{R}^{n}$ can be considered as a function on a finite ($n$ pointed)set $M$ equiped  with discrete counting measure and a matrix is a function on $M\times M$. Now the product $AX$ has an integral representation if we replace $\sum$ by the integral sign. That is we read the expersion $\sum a_{ij}x_{j}$ in the integral form $\int_{M} a_{ij}x_{j}$ where the integration is based on the normalized counting measure.
Now we state our questions as generalization of the above simple fact about matrices.
Assume that $M$ is a compact orientable manifold or a Lie or topological group. So $M$ has a natural measure, correspond to volum form or the invariant metric or Haar measure.
Assume that $g: M \times M \to \mathbb{R}$ is a smooth function which satisfies $$\int_{M} g(x,y)dx=0\;\;\;\;\;(1) $$ for all $y \in M$.

Does the linear map $A$ on  $C^{\infty} (M)$ has nontrivial kernel?
  $$A(f)(x)=\int_{M} g(x,y)f(y)dy$$

Note that for topological groups we consider continuous functions, since smoothness is meaningles.
For our next question, we assume that $M$ is a symplectic manifold, so $M \times M$ has a natural symplectic structure. 
Let $L$ be the space of all smooth functions on $M\times M$ which satisfy the equation (1).

Is $L$ closed under Poisson bracket?

 A: For the first question, the answer is not necessarily. 
Very rough idea: The rank-nullity theorem doesn't always hold on infinite dimensional spaces. 
Rough idea: Let the operator $A$ be defined on $L^2(M)$ be a injective mapping such that its range does not include the constant function. More precisely, since $M$ is compact we can enumerate its eigenvalues (of the Laplacian) increasing with multiplicity as $\lambda_i$, with $\lambda_0 = 0$ corresponding to the constants. Now let $\psi:\overline{\mathbb{N}}\to \overline{\mathbb{N}}$ such that $\psi$ is injective and such that the range of $\psi$ does not contain $0$. Then defining $A$ as the map that sends the $i$th eigenspace to $\psi(i)$th eigenspace will provide a counterexample. 
Realization: In practice to guarantee smoothness it is easier to not keep $A$ an isometry. Take $M = \mathbb{S}^1$ for simplicity. Let 
$$ \phi_-(x) := \sum_{k < 0} 2^{-|k|} e^{ik x} $$
The series is absolutely convergent and in fact defines a $C^\infty$ function. Similarly we define
$$ \phi_+(x) := \sum_{k \geq 0} 2^{-|k|} e^{ikx} $$
Define your function $g$ by 
$$ g(x,y) = \phi_-(x-y) + e^{ix} \phi_+(x-y) $$
It is easy to check that $\int_{0}^{2\pi} g(x,y) ~\mathrm{d}x = 0$ for any fixed $y$. But the operator $f(x) \mapsto \int g(x,y) f(y) ~\mathrm{d}y$ has no nontrivial kernel. 
A: Willie Wong answered the general case, and I'd like to give a counterexample for the symplectic case:
Let $M=S^2$, the standard 2-sphere embedded in $\mathbb{R}^3$ as the unit sphere, with the standard symplectic form corresponding to the Euclidean metric on $\mathbb{R}^3$. Take on $(M \times M, \Omega = \omega \oplus - \omega)$ the functions 
\begin{align}
f(z,w) &= z_3\cdot F(w),
\\
g(z,w) &= z_3 \cdot G(w)
\end{align}
both of which are in $L$. 
Now, $\{ f, g \} = \Omega(\mathrm{sgrad}(g), \mathrm{sgrad}(f)) =: \Omega'(\mathrm{d}f, \mathrm{d}g)$. Then,
\begin{align}
\{f,g\} 
&= (\omega' \oplus (-\omega')) \left( F(w)\mathrm{d} z_3 + z_3 \mathrm{d} F(w), G(w)\mathrm{d} z_3 + z_3 \mathrm{d} G(w) \right) \\
&= F(w)G(w) \omega'(\mathrm{d}z_3,\mathrm{d}z_3) - z_3^2 \omega'(\mathrm{d} F(w),\mathrm{d} G(w)) 
\\
&= z_3^2 \{G,F\}(w) =:h(z,w)
\end{align}
Now, unless $\{G,F\} \equiv 0$, $h$ will not be in $L$.
