4
$\begingroup$

$(A, \mathfrak{m})$ a Noetherian local ring, $a\in\mathfrak{m}$ a zero divisor. Then is it true that $\mbox{dim}\ A/(a) = \mbox{dim}\ A$ ?

$\endgroup$
15
$\begingroup$

No. Let A be the ring k[x,y,z]/(xz,yz) localized at (x,y,z). Then the dimension of A is 2, but the dimension of A/(x) is one. Note that xz = 0 in A.

The geometric picture is this: In 3-space, take the union of the horizontal z=0 plane with the vertical line x = y = 0, and look at the local ring at the origin. Then restricting to x=0, we get the union of the y-axis and the z-axis.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Such pictures are good for the memory. $\endgroup$ – Martin Brandenburg May 12 '10 at 0:05
  • $\begingroup$ @Charles Staats: What is the most easiest way to see that dimA=2? Thanks a lot! $\endgroup$ – TmobiusX May 13 '10 at 7:02
5
$\begingroup$

Necessary and sufficient conditions for your question to have a positive answer are that $A$ be $\textit{unmixed}$, that is, every associated prime is a minimal prime, and $\textit{equidimensional}$, that is, $\mathrm{dim} (A/\mathfrak{p}) = \mathrm{dim}(A)$ for every minimal prime $\mathfrak p$. Charles Staats' example is not equidimensional. The one-dimensional ring $A=k[x,y]/(x^2,xy)$ is not unmixed, and $A/(y)$ has dimension zero. Sufficiency follows from the fact that the set of zerodivisors of $A$ is equal to the union of the associated primes.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.