1
$\begingroup$

SETUP: Let $R$ be a finitely generated, noetherian, integral domain of characteristic $0$. Let $G$ be a finite group that acts on $R$ by ring automorphisms.

QUESTION: Is $R$ a finitely generated module over the fixed subring $R^G$?

REMARK: Since $R$ has characteristic $0$, K R Nagarajan's 1968 counter-example does not apply. Since the order of $G$ is not a unit in $R$, G M Bergman's 1971 positive result does not apply, either. My secondary source for this information is page 13 of an e-presentation of Dobbs--Shapiro.

COROLLARY 1: $R^G$ is noetherian, since $R$ is, by the Eakin–Nagata theorem.

COROLLARY 2: $R$ is integral over $R^G$, by the so-called Determinantal Trick. Since $R$ is a domain, then this is true independently, by Exercise 13.2 in Eisenbud's book on commutative algebra. In particular, $\dim(R^G)=\dim(R)$ by the Cohen–Seidenberg theorems [Eisenbud: 4.15, 4.18].

MOTIVATION: I am a topologist, and the class of examples of the Question that occur for me are the group rings $R=\mathbb{Z}[A]$, where $A$ is a finite-rank free-abelian group, and where $G$ acts on $A$ by group automorphisms. Is the Question true at least in this setting? (Note that $R$ is not a hereditary ring.)

SIMILAR POST: Question #241618

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I don't understand your remark. Where are you assuming or showing that $R$ has characteristic $0$? $\endgroup$ – Qiaochu Yuan Jun 12 '16 at 4:48
  • $\begingroup$ @Qiaochu Yuan: Thank you --- I edited the setup to add "of characteristic 0." Some sort of characteristic-zero counter-example was produced in 1977 by C L Chuang and P H Lee. Sadly, I'm not able to get access to this article or the two mentioned in the remark, so I can't study them. $\endgroup$ – Qayum Khan Jun 12 '16 at 5:16
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The only hypothesis you need is $R$ finitely generated (no characteristic 0, or japanese, or...). See Bourbaki's Commutative algebra V, §1, no. 9, Theorem 2. $\endgroup$ – abx Jun 12 '16 at 7:41
  • $\begingroup$ @abx: That is an absolutely perfect answer. It has taken me some time to get the book and verify the statement and the proof. Please shift your comment to an official answer, so that it is credited as answer and the question can be closed. For the record, the second part of that Theorem 2 (with ground ring $K=\mathbb{Z}$) states that the fixed subring $R^G$ is also finitely generated as a ring. $\endgroup$ – Qayum Khan Jun 14 '16 at 0:37
  • $\begingroup$ What you want is the Artin-Tate Lemma. $\endgroup$ – Ben Lim Jun 14 '16 at 5:57
1
$\begingroup$

At the request of Qayum Khan, I put my comment into an answer: the only hypothesis needed is $R$ finitely generated (no characteristic $0$, or japanese, or...). See Bourbaki's Commutative algebra V, §1, no. 9, Theorem 2.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.