3
$\begingroup$

Call a topological space $\langle X,\mathscr{O}\rangle$ regular iff it is both $T_0$ and $T_3$: for every point $x\notin A$, where $A$ is a closed subsets of $X$, there are open and disjoint sets $V$ and $U$ such that $x\in V$ and $A\subseteq U$.

A $\langle X,\mathscr{O}\rangle$ space is linear-based iff in every its point there is a local basis which is linearly ordered by $\subseteq$ relation.

Could you give me an example of a regular space which is not linear-based?

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ Please provide the information about where in mathematics do arrive mentioned above by you linear-based topological spaces, why are them interesting? $\endgroup$ – Evgeny Kuznetsov Apr 26 '18 at 9:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Clearly all metric spaces are linear based. Thus not being linear based is an obstruction to metrizability. The example I gave is an example that the second countability assumption in Urysohns metrization theorem is essential. $\endgroup$ – HenrikRüping Apr 26 '18 at 10:10
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I am not aware of it. $\endgroup$ – HenrikRüping Apr 26 '18 at 10:27
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In my case the interest in such spaces stems from point-free topology, especially the part of it dealing with the so-called Boolean Contact Algebras. Point-free counterparts of linear bases (i.e. certain chains in BCAs) are good approximations of points and linear-based spaces are used for representation theorems for BCAs (at least in my studies of BCAs, there are different approaches too). As far as I know there is no book nor paper devoted to class of linear-based spaces. But check the so-called well-based spaces and radial spaces which are related to linear-based. $\endgroup$ – Mad Hatter Apr 26 '18 at 10:44
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @EvgenyKuznetsov This freely available paper by Dimiter Vakarelov may be a good starting point: link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-0-387-69245-6_6 $\endgroup$ – Mad Hatter Apr 26 '18 at 14:11
6
$\begingroup$

An uncountable product of copies of the unit interval or of the discrete two element space. Indeed none of the points in this space has a linearly ordered local basis.

Let us have a look at the latter. Let $X:= \prod_I \{0,1\}$, let $0\in X$ be the sequence which is zero everywhere and let $S_i\subset X$ be the subset consisting of all sequences whose $i$-th coordinate is zero.

By definition of the product topology, any open neighborhood of $0$ can be contained in only finitely many of the $S_i$'s.

Now suppose you have a linearly ordered basis $B$. Assign to each basis element $U$ the finite subset $f(U) = \{i\in I| S_i\supset U\}$.

Since $B$ is a basis, we know that every $i$ appears in some $f(U)$. It follows that $I$ is an union of nested, finite sets and hence countable. Contradiction!

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Henrik, the third paragraph should say "any basic open neighborhood of 0", for if you take for example $T_n$ to be the set of all sequences which have 0's at first $n$ terms, than $\bigcup_{n\in\omega}T_n$ is cotained in every $S_i$, for $i\in\omega$. Am I right? $\endgroup$ – Mad Hatter Nov 20 '18 at 22:03
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @MadHatter: The $T_i$'s form a decreasing sequence of open sets, Thus their union is just the first of the $T_i$'s, if we replaced union by intersection, we dont get something open. It also follows that if any basic open neighborhood of 0 is contained in only finitely many of the $S_i$'s, then any open nbhd of 0 can be contained in finitely many of the $S_i$'s (just pick a basic open nbh contained in it). $\endgroup$ – HenrikRüping Nov 21 '18 at 3:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.